Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Calling all Data Engineers! Fabric Data Engineer (Exam DP-700) live sessions are back! Starting October 16th. Sign up.

Reply
ps1
New Member

Trouble filtering on denormalized model

I have a data table with >100 millions rows I have determined that joins to dimension tables are costly. I have moved the dimensions columns directly to the large data and I can rewrite the DAX queries such that they use those filters. The problem is I also have other data tables, indirectly related to the large data table, that also need to use those same filters for the same denormalized dimension columns. How do I get one slicer to filter several unrelated tables based on the same column names. So Table1[colA], Table2[colA], Table3[colA] can't be related but all need to be filtered from ONE slicer that is providing the value for colA?

 

Thanks

2 REPLIES 2
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi @ps1 ,

According to your problems, here are my answers.

If your denormalized dimension columns are in dimension tables, you can create a measure to filter slicers. You can create a measure like this:

Filter Slicers = COUNTROWS(RELATEDTABLE('Table'))

 You can also look at this topic for some helps: Solved: Power BI One Slicer to filter other slicers - Microsoft Fabric Community

Also, you can create a separate table that contains all the unique values from your denormalized dimension columns.

vyilongmsft_0-1707196306838.png

Use the following formula to create the new table.

Names = DISTINCT (
    UNION (
        VALUES (Table1[Requested By]),
        VALUES (Table2[Requested By]),
        VALUES (Table3[Requested By])
    )
)

Now you can  create relationships from this new “Names” table to each of your other tables, use the "Requested By" column from "Names" tables as your slicer. Read this document may help you more: powerbi - One Slicer for Power BI Desktop affecting multiple tables - Stack Overflow

 

 

 

Best Regards

Yilong Zhou

If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

amitchandak
Super User
Super User

@ps1 , Make sure the join is 1-m Single directional and they are numeric join. Then they should work well. Usually, a large dimension can slow down. But small dimensions with large facts should work

 

Now if you want use value between disconnected tables you can use filter or treatas

 

calculate([Measure], filter(Table1, Table2[Col1] in values(Table1[Col1]) ))

 

or

 

CALCULATE([Measure],
TREATAS (values(Table1[col1]) ,
Table2[Col1]  )
)

 

https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/propagate-filters-using-treatas-in-dax/

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dax/treatas-function

Share with Power BI Enthusiasts: Full Power BI Video (20 Hours) YouTube
Microsoft Fabric Series 60+ Videos YouTube
Microsoft Fabric Hindi End to End YouTube

Helpful resources

Announcements
FabCon Global Hackathon Carousel

FabCon Global Hackathon

Join the Fabric FabCon Global Hackathon—running virtually through Nov 3. Open to all skill levels. $10,000 in prizes!

FabCon Atlanta 2026 carousel

FabCon Atlanta 2026

Join us at FabCon Atlanta, March 16-20, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.

Top Solution Authors
Top Kudoed Authors