Supplies are limited. Contact info@espc.tech right away to save your spot before the conference sells out.
Get your discountScore big with last-minute savings on the final tickets to FabCon Vienna. Secure your discount
I have this basic data set:
Name | Category | Totals |
Todd | Category A | 7500 |
Brian | Category B | 5000 |
Stewart | Category B | 4000 |
Todd | Category A | 3000 |
Chelsea | Category A | 1500 |
Vanessa | Category B | 700 |
Steven | Category B | 400 |
Elliot | Category A | 250 |
On Page 1, I'm doing a breakdown of everything that happened with Category A, and the same on Page 2 with Category B. I'm doing the same table for each breakdown and am doing the Top 3 values for each category, so on Page 1, I'd want this:
Category A Table:
Name | Value |
Todd | 7500 |
Stewart | 4000 |
Chelsea | 1500 |
And this on Page 2:
Category B Table:
Name | Value |
Brian | 5000 |
Todd | 3000 |
Vanessa | 700 |
Currently, when I do this on the separate pages, it's not showing the Top 3 based on the filters (Page 1 is filtered completely for Category A, Page 2 filtered completely for Category B). It's essentially showing only the top values until it gets to the other category, where it stops counting. Is there a way I can create a measure or a calculated column (preferred) that would allow me to correctly do the tables?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Found the solution! It was as simple taking the Value column and, clicking on the down carrot, change the default "Sum" checkmark and change it to "Don't Summarize." It was grouping all similarly valued items together instead of displaying them separately.
Found the solution! It was as simple taking the Value column and, clicking on the down carrot, change the default "Sum" checkmark and change it to "Don't Summarize." It was grouping all similarly valued items together instead of displaying them separately.