Microsoft Fabric Community Conference 2025, March 31 - April 2, Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code FABINSIDER for a $400 discount.
Register nowThe Power BI DataViz World Championships are on! With four chances to enter, you could win a spot in the LIVE Grand Finale in Las Vegas. Show off your skills.
Good Evening @Greg_Deckler ,
Attempting to understand and replicate your message using CountRows instead of RankX. However, having difficulty replicating the results shown in your message. I have recreated your 'Table' and copied your Measure3.
GroupItemValueToHellWithRankXDescMeasure3
one | Item 1 | 700 | |
one | Item 2 | 800 | |
one | Item 3 | 900 | |
one | Item 4 | 1000 | |
Three | Item 10 | 12 | |
Three | Item 8 | 200 | |
Three | Item 9 | 1100 | |
two | Item 5 | 500 | |
two | Item 6 | 400 | |
two | Item 7 | 300 |
ToHellWithRankXDescMeasure3 =
COUNTROWS(
FILTER(
SUMMARIZE(
FILTER(
ALL('Table'),
[Group] = MAX([Group])
),
[Item],
"Value",SUM('Table'[Value])
),
[Value]>=SUM([Value])
)
)
But I get a blank column. Unable to figure out where or what I am doing wrong. Hoping you can find or point out what I am missing.
Once I get this, then I hope to be able to subsitute my own values and add some additional complexities and scenarios that I need to account for in my data set.
Thanks in advance and Best Regards,
Solved! Go to Solution.
If this post helps, then please consider accepting it as the solution to help other members find it faster, and give a big thumbs up.
If this post helps, then please consider accepting it as the solution to help other members find it faster, and give a big thumbs up.
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Check out the February 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
81 | |
53 | |
38 | |
35 |