Check your eligibility for this 50% exam voucher offer and join us for free live learning sessions to get prepared for Exam DP-700.
Get StartedDon't miss out! 2025 Microsoft Fabric Community Conference, March 31 - April 2, Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount. Prices go up February 11th. Register now.
Hello,
I have created a simplified example that communicates by confusion over slicer vs. filter behaviour.
Your help would be appreciated.
In the example below I have "Country" = "UK" & "City" = "London" as page level filters. The table reflects the desired filtering.
However, I want the user to be able to filter by "Storename" using a slicer.
Why does my slicer not reflect the filters on page?
Ideally it should show only the Storenames in "London", right?
If you imagine a larger data model with several hundred stores per City, then that gets frustrating for the user...
If I try to place filters directly on the Slicer visual that doesn't seem to work..
My model is a simplified Star schema, relationship "Many" is on the fact table side, "one" is on the dimension tables that contain unique records.
Solved! Go to Solution.
@Camstr , You have to make joins bidirectional
or create a measure
countrows(Filter(Store, Store[CityID] in Values(Location[City]) )
Use this measure in the visual level filter of the store
How to filter the slicer of a disconnected table: https://youtu.be/cV5WfaQt6C8
@Camstr , You have to make joins bidirectional
or create a measure
countrows(Filter(Store, Store[CityID] in Values(Location[City]) )
Use this measure in the visual level filter of the store
How to filter the slicer of a disconnected table: https://youtu.be/cV5WfaQt6C8
User | Count |
---|---|
116 | |
73 | |
60 | |
48 | |
48 |
User | Count |
---|---|
171 | |
122 | |
60 | |
59 | |
56 |