Check your eligibility for this 50% exam voucher offer and join us for free live learning sessions to get prepared for Exam DP-700.
Get StartedDon't miss out! 2025 Microsoft Fabric Community Conference, March 31 - April 2, Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount. Prices go up February 11th. Register now.
Hi everybody,
This is my data model:
I've created 2 tables. One has users that have worked on an incident (PMO-2737), and the other one has users that have worked on subtasks of the same incident (PMO-2737)
What I would like to generate is a table that has all that information together. I mean, incident, author and timeworked:
With this link you can download the DataSet and tables created on PBI:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1j37TbRTXFTW_6-UZl2oG6psSt3sRO8To/view
Thank you all!
Regards
Solved! Go to Solution.
Ah okay,
I can see the issue you'll need to merge the sub task table into the bitacora subtask to get the parent id first - rename the columns then append.
I've updated the file for you to take a look at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-YAMIgt8UO1LCo1ErFV5M8hu3KwFMiEV/view?usp=share_link
If I answered your question, please mark my post as solution, Appreciate your Kudos 👍
Hi,
you could either union the tables together in a calculated table:
or
append them together in power query, which would be the best for perfomance:
If I answered your question, please mark my post as solution, Appreciate your Kudos 👍
Thanks DOLEARY85 for your quick reply!
I've tried that approach, but it doesn't help me, because I need the incident field.
How do I know that last records are from PMO-2737 or from anotherone?
Thanks
Which approach did you try the append or union?
The append.
Ah okay,
I can see the issue you'll need to merge the sub task table into the bitacora subtask to get the parent id first - rename the columns then append.
I've updated the file for you to take a look at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-YAMIgt8UO1LCo1ErFV5M8hu3KwFMiEV/view?usp=share_link
If I answered your question, please mark my post as solution, Appreciate your Kudos 👍
That worked perfectly! Thank you very much!
Regards,
Lean
No problem, happy to help 🙂
I also tried with the Union approach, and obtain the same result:
User | Count |
---|---|
118 | |
75 | |
60 | |
50 | |
44 |
User | Count |
---|---|
175 | |
125 | |
60 | |
60 | |
58 |