Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Shape the future of the Fabric Community! Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions. Take survey.

Reply
i_kafali
Helper II
Helper II

SELECTCOLUMNS does not return correct values from existing table

Hello,

 

I have an existing table called OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL. so i have created new table called PARETO to make more lean table.

 

To create PARETO table i used below formula

 

PARETO = SELECTCOLUMNS(OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL;"currency";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[Currency Selection];"year";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[Only Year];"month";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[MONTH];"scenario";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[Fiili/Bütçe];"entity";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[FIRMA];"seller";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[SAT_AD];"customer no";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[CUSTOMER_NO];"customer";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[MUS_AD];"product";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[DESCRIPTION];"BU";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[BU];"volume (ton)";[Volume (ton)];"Turnover";[TurnoverPV];"FP1";[FP1];"FP2";[FP2])

 

at the end of the results some fields does not return correct values. for instance some entities returns corrrect values and some returns totally nonsense figures

 

what else should i do?

 

Best regards,

23 REPLIES 23
tex628
Community Champion
Community Champion

PARETO = SELECTCOLUMNS(OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL;
"currency";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[Currency Selection];
"year";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[Only Year];
"month";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[MONTH];
"scenario";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[Fiili/Bütçe];
"entity";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[FIRMA];
"seller";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[SAT_AD];
"customer no";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[CUSTOMER_NO];
"customer";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[MUS_AD];
"product";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[DESCRIPTION];
"BU";OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[BU];
"volume (ton)";[Volume (ton)];
"Turnover";[TurnoverPV];
"FP1";[FP1];
"FP2";[FP2]
)

Does all columns produce inconsistant values or can you see any pattern? 


Connect on LinkedIn

Hi tex628

 

Not all columns returns incosistent figures but especially some entities and some products returns incosistent figures

 

For instance G entity returns -7099 tons whereas it should be -3825

 

Under that entity, all products returns incosistent values

 

EntitiyVolume (ton)
OK_INVOICE_EXCEL
Volume (ton)
PARETO
A11.12411.824
B4.8934.893
C1.6001.600
D2424
E8787
F4747
G-3.825-7.099
Grand Total13.95013.950
tex628
Community Champion
Community Champion

From what i can tell your "PARETO" table is a combination of columns from the OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL table and four different measures. Is it only the measure values that display incorrect values?

 

"volume (ton)";[Volume (ton)];
"Turnover";[TurnoverPV];
"FP1";[FP1];
"FP2";[FP2]

 


Connect on LinkedIn

No tex, all value measures returns incorrect values. as G has incorrect volumes as well as turnover, FP1 and FP2

Btw all those volume, turnover, FP1 and Fp2 is calculated new measure from existing table. not coming from original data set.

tex628
Community Champion
Community Champion

Can you provide the dax forumla for one of the four measures?


Connect on LinkedIn

Sure,

 

Thank you for reaching me out btw

 

Volume (ton) =
CALCULATE(
SUM('OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL'[Volume (t)]);
'OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL'[FAT_TIP (groups)] IN { "Count" }
)

 

TurnoverPV = (SUM(OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[DUSD_PV])+SUM(OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[IADE_USD])+SUM(OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[dgr_gel1]))/1000

 

FP1 = OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[TurnoverPV]+OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[Raw Material]+OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[Packaging]+OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[Logistics]+OK_INVOICE_ALL_EXCEL[Commission] 

 

 

FP2 = ([FP1]+[Depreciation Cost]+[Conversion Cost]+[Invent. Mov.])

tex628
Community Champion
Community Champion

Quick question, if you compare your PARETO table to your original table, does the row count differentiate?

 


Connect on LinkedIn

row count.png

 

Rex, both has 970.250 rows

tex628
Community Champion
Community Champion

Next question! 

In this picture:

 

image.png

 

Is the OK_INVOICE_EXCEL Values from a measure while PARETO values are from a column?


Connect on LinkedIn

volume ton is calculated measure from OK_INVOICE_EXCEL which i try to use in PARETO table with SELECTCOLUMN formula

tex628
Community Champion
Community Champion

I understand, i'm in the same spot.

I have an idea that might be the cause.


My thought is that the entities that show correct values are distinct, while those that show inconsistant values occur in more than one row. 

 

-----

 

Either way, this is a rather difficult issue. is it possible for you to create a relationship between INVOICE and PARETO?


Connect on LinkedIn

Rex i tried to create relationship between those two tables but then it says like in the picture

 

relationship.png

tex628
Community Champion
Community Champion

To create a relationship one table must have unique values in all 970,000 rows. 

Do you have any column that has all unique values? Proberbly something like ProductID or something similar?


Connect on LinkedIn

Rex i also tried that (product id, customer id etc.) still didnt work. 

 

Also i produced all the columns in PARETO table from OK_INVOICE_EXCEL table. shouldnt it be unique since row counts are the same?

 

I really don't understand 😞

tex628
Community Champion
Community Champion

If you take a look at your column like this: 

 

image.pngimage.png

 

You can see that my Questions column has 12 unique rows while my Answers column only has 3! 

See if you have any where all 970,000 rows are unique (distict) 🙂


Connect on LinkedIn

Yes distinct counts are also same for entity names

 

disctinct values.png

tex628
Community Champion
Community Champion

Whats that value for the product ID column? 


Connect on LinkedIn

disctinct values.png

 

Both same Rex

tex628
Community Champion
Community Champion

How is it going?


Connect on LinkedIn

Helpful resources

Announcements
November Carousel

Fabric Community Update - November 2024

Find out what's new and trending in the Fabric Community.

Dec Fabric Community Survey

We want your feedback!

Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions.