Rolling sum, stop by another field according to group - Power Query

[Anonymous]

Hi, 

In the example data can be identified 3 groups by [Type], A, B and C, and 5 groups by [Type] and [Name], A-John, A-Mia, B-Mia, B-Bob and C-John. [Type] A has [Stock] = 3, [Type] B has [Stock] = 1 and [Type] C has [Stock] = 2. Also, [Type] A, [Name] John has [WIP] = 2, [Type] A, [Name] Mia has [WIP] = 1, etc. 

ID	Date	Quantity	Type	Name	Stock	WIP
1	2019/12/20	1	A	John	3	2
2	2019/12/21	1	A	John	3	2
3	2019/12/22	2	A	John	3	2
4	2019/12/22	1	A	Mia	3	1
5	2019/12/18	1	B	Mia	1	3
6	2019/12/20	3	B	Mia	1	3
7	2019/12/21	2	B	Bob	1	1
8	2019/12/20	1	C	John	2	1
9	2019/12/22	1	C	John	2	1
10	2019/12/22	1	C	John	2	1

Each line of the data is a purchase order of some [Quantity] from a client.

I´d like to, first, identify which lines can be satisfied with [Stock], for each [Type], ordered by [Date] (i.e., first satisfy the oldest line).

Then, I´d like to identify which of the lines that could not be satisfied with [Stock] can be satisfied with [WIP], for each [Type]+[Name], again ordered by date.

Any solution that identifies those lines is ok, but I imagine that it could be done like this:

[HasStock] calculates the rolling sum of [Quantity] by [Type], ordered by [Date], with the condition that the result is less than or equal to [Stock]. In other case it should be 0.

[HasWIP] calculates the rolling sum of [Quantity] by [Type] and [Name], ordered by [Date], only for the rows where [Stock] can´t meet the demand, i.e. [HasStock] = 0, with the condition that the result is less than or equal to [WIP]. In other case it should be 0.

Best regards.

[Anonymous]

Hi @Anonymous ,

If i understand you correctly, ALLEXCEPT() function and EARLIER() function might be helpful for you.

But one thing I'm confused about is what you mean "ordered by [Date] (i.e., first satisfy the oldest line)". As i can see from your sample data the Date of ID 3 and 4 is same, their Quantity is less than stock. Why HasStock of ID 3 and 10 is 0, how do you judge the "oldest line"?

Best Regards,

Jay

Community Support Team _ Jay Wang

If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

[Greg_Deckler]

So you already have the solution or is that how you imagine the solution being done?

[Anonymous]

@Greg_Deckler This is how I imagine it being done. I just want to identify which lines can be satisfied with stock and then with WIP, by date, with the logic I wrote.

@Anonymous ID 3 and ID 4 quantity is less than stock, but when you do the cummulative sum ID 3 can´t satisfy stock.

For [Type] A there are 4 purchase orders:

• ID 1, of Quantity 1 and date 12/20
• ID 2, of Quantity 1 and date 12/21
• ID 3, of Quantity 2 and date 12/22
• ID 4, of Quantity 1 and date 12/22

Also, A has a [Stock] of 3 and a [WIP] of 2.

So, by [Date], you would take the first purchase order, ID 1, and try if [Stock] can satisfy it. Because 1 <= 3 it can be done. Now we have only 2 left in [Stock].

Then you take the second purchase order by [Date], ID 2, and try if [Stock] can satisfy it. Because 1 <= 2 it can be done. Now we have only 1 left in [Stock].

Then you take the next purchase order by [Date]. It does not matter if you take first ID 3 or ID 4 because they have the same [Date], but I wanted to take that case in consideration. If you try ID 3, its [Quantity], 2, is not less than or equal to 1 left in [Stock], so [Stock] can´t satisfy ID 3 and the column I imagined [HasStock] should be a 0. Then you try ID 4 and check that 1<=1 in [Stock] so ID 4 can be satisfied. Now we have 0 left in [Stock].

ID 1, ID 2 and ID 4 can be satisfied with [Stock]. ID 3 can be satisfied with [WIP] (but the grouping must be [Type]-[Name] as I described).

Doing it by [Date] I mean, If the case were this:

• ID 1, of Quantity 1 and date 12/20
• ID 2, of Quantity 1 and date 12/21
• ID 3, of Quantity 2 and date 12/22
• ID 4, of Quantity 1 and date 12/22
• ID 5, of Quantity 1 and date 12/23
• ID 6, of Quantity 2 and date 12/24

ID 1, ID 2 and ID 4 can be satisfied with [Stock]. ID 3 can be satisfied with [WIP]. ID 5 and ID 6 can´t be satisfied (you need to start with ID 1).

[Anonymous · Accepted solution]

Hi @Anonymous ,

Please check following formulas.

HasStock = 
VAR t =
 FILTER ( 'Table', [Type] = EARLIER ( 'Table'[Type] ) )
VAR Stock =
 MAXX ( t, [Stock] )
VAR beforeDayLeft =
 Stock
 - CALCULATE (
 SUM ( 'Table'[Quantity] ),
 FILTER ( t, [Date] < EARLIER ( 'Table'[Date] ) )
 )
VAR thisdayQuantity =
 CALCULATE (
 SUM ( 'Table'[Quantity] ),
 FILTER ( t, [Date] = EARLIER ( 'Table'[Date] ) )
 )
VAR i = [ID]
VAR d = [Date]
VAR q = [Quantity]
RETURN
 IF (
 thisdayQuantity < beforeDayLeft,
 RANKX ( FILTER ( t, [Date] <= EARLIER ( 'Table'[Date] ) ), [ID], i, ASC, DENSE ),
 VAR thisDayt =
 FILTER ( t, 'Table'[Date] = d )
 VAR thisDaytRank =
 ADDCOLUMNS (
 thisDayt,
 "Index", RANKX ( thisDayt, [Quantity],, ASC, DENSE )
 + RANKX ( thisDayt, [ID],, ASC, DENSE ) / 10
 )
 VAR r =
 RANKX ( thisDayt, [Quantity], q, ASC, DENSE )
 + RANKX ( thisDayt, [ID], i, ASC, DENSE ) / 10
 RETURN
 IF (
 CALCULATE ( SUM ( 'Table'[Quantity] ), FILTER ( thisDaytRank, [Index] <= r ) ) > beforeDayLeft,
 0,
 CALCULATE ( DISTINCTCOUNT ( 'Table'[ID] ), FILTER ( t, 'Table'[Date] < d ) )
 + RANKX ( thisDayt, [Quantity], q, ASC, DENSE )
 )
 )

HasWIP = 
VAR t =
 FILTER (
 'Table',
 [Type] = EARLIER ( 'Table'[Type] )
 && [Name] = EARLIER ( 'Table'[Name] )
 )
VAR TotalWIP =
 MAXX ( t, [WIP] )
VAR d = [Date]
RETURN
 IF (
 [HasStock] <> 0,
 BLANK (),
 IF (
 'Table'[Quantity] > TotalWIP,
 0,
 VAR d = [Date]
 VAR q = [Quantity]
 VAR i = [ID]
 VAR PreviousT =
 FILTER ( t, [HasStock] = 0 && [Date] <= d )
 VAR PreviousTRank =
 ADDCOLUMNS (
 PreviousT,
 "Index", RANKX ( PreviousT, [Date],, ASC, DENSE )
 + RANKX ( PreviousT, [Quantity],, ASC, DENSE ) / 100
 + RANKX ( PreviousT, [ID],, ASC, DENSE ) / 10000
 )
 VAR r =
 RANKX ( PreviousT, [Date], d, ASC, DENSE )
 + RANKX ( PreviousT, [Quantity], q, ASC, DENSE ) / 100
 + RANKX ( PreviousT, [ID], i, ASC, DENSE ) / 10000
 RETURN
 IF (
 CALCULATE ( SUM ( 'Table'[Quantity] ), FILTER ( PreviousTRank, [Index] <= r ) ) <= TotalWIP,
 [Quantity],
 0
 )
 )
 )

Result would be shown as below.

BTW, Pbix as attached, hopefully works for you.

Best Regards,

Jay

Community Support Team _ Jay Wang

If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

[Anonymous]

o_O Impresive! Thank you!!