Forum Discussion
Rank Based on a Switch Sub Category Measure
- 6 years ago
Here is an approach that creates a virtual table and then filters it to employees of the same type (in the selected context), and then the rank is determined using the Value expression in the RANKX formula. Please try this measure expression. I'm not sure why it doesn't match your rank values, but it does calculate rank within each type group. You can adapt it to get your desired result. Did you rank based on Employee ID?
Rank by Type = VAR currenttype = [Sales Employee Type] VAR overallrank = [Overall Rank by Employee ID] VAR summary = ADDCOLUMNS ( ALLSELECTED ( Employees[Employee ID] ), "@type", [Sales Employee Type], "@rank", [Overall Rank by Employee ID] ) RETURN RANKX ( FILTER ( summary, [@type] = currenttype ), [@rank], overallrank, ASC )If this works for you, please mark it as the solution. Kudos are appreciated too. Please let me know if not.
Regards,
Pat
Hi Anonymous ,
I'm so sorry I didn't find other alternative solution to create a measure that sort the data base on the measure [Sales Employee Type] currently...
mahoneypat , Ashish_Mathur Could you please help check the following problem? You can download the sample pbix file from the this link. Thank you in advance.
Best Regards
Rena
Here is an approach that creates a virtual table and then filters it to employees of the same type (in the selected context), and then the rank is determined using the Value expression in the RANKX formula. Please try this measure expression. I'm not sure why it doesn't match your rank values, but it does calculate rank within each type group. You can adapt it to get your desired result. Did you rank based on Employee ID?
Rank by Type =
VAR currenttype = [Sales Employee Type]
VAR overallrank = [Overall Rank by Employee ID]
VAR summary =
ADDCOLUMNS (
ALLSELECTED ( Employees[Employee ID] ),
"@type", [Sales Employee Type],
"@rank", [Overall Rank by Employee ID]
)
RETURN
RANKX ( FILTER ( summary, [@type] = currenttype ), [@rank], overallrank, ASC )
If this works for you, please mark it as the solution. Kudos are appreciated too. Please let me know if not.
Regards,
Pat
- Anonymous6 years agoNot applicable