Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Find everything you need to get certified on Fabric—skills challenges, live sessions, exam prep, role guidance, and more. Get started

Reply
Kevin-Mann
Frequent Visitor

RELATED() function removes filters and returns aggregate

 I have a DirectQuery model with the below relationship:

 

Allocations 1--* Positions 1--* Exposures

 

I have a filter on the Allocations table that gives me an allocation for associated positions by child company.  When I use the RELATED() function, it clears the filter on the Allocations table and returns the sum of all companies with allocations in the child company.  Is there a work-around for this to tell DAX, "I filtered the table for a reason, so please use my filters!"?

 

Thanks in advance!

 

KM

2 REPLIES 2
v-yuta-msft
Community Support
Community Support

Hi Kevin-Mann,

 

How about not use RELATED() function?If still can't achieve what you want , I would recommend you to merge your tables or use DAX function like SUMMARIZEor SUMMARIZECOLUMNS .

 

Regards,

Jimmy Tao

Jimmy,

 

Thanks for writing back.  Using SUMMARIZE is counter-intuitive, clunky, and is exponentially slower.  I also get an error that there are more than 1M rows, when I expand the date range.  Can I somehow use RELATED in the context of ALLSELECTED?

 

Kind Regards,

Kevin

Helpful resources

Announcements
Europe Fabric Conference

Europe’s largest Microsoft Fabric Community Conference

Join the community in Stockholm for expert Microsoft Fabric learning including a very exciting keynote from Arun Ulag, Corporate Vice President, Azure Data.

Power BI Carousel June 2024

Power BI Monthly Update - June 2024

Check out the June 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.

RTI Forums Carousel3

New forum boards available in Real-Time Intelligence.

Ask questions in Eventhouse and KQL, Eventstream, and Reflex.