Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-700) exam on us!
Learn moreThe FabCon + SQLCon recap series starts April 14th at 8am Pacific. If you’re tracking where AI is going inside Fabric, this first session is a can't miss. Register now
Hi all,
I have "units" which depend on each other, and I want to visualize the relationship between them with Network Navigator (best option I found). relationships look like this:
(-> = depends on)
A -> B, C
B -> D
C -> E, F
S -> U,V
AFAIK, the right way to model this type of relationship is by source + target fields, something like this:
| source | target |
| A | B |
| A | C |
| B | D |
| C | E |
| C | F |
| S | U |
| S | V |
The problem raises when I want to filter only A and see all its relevant dependencies, but only his. If I filter "source"=A, I get only A's direct dependencies (B, C) and not other levels (B->D, C->E, F).
If I'm not filtering at all, I get also S and its dependencies, which are irrelevant if my goal is to investigate A.
Of course it's a big issue when the scale is much larger, when I have tens of thousands of units.
Thought about adding levels of hierarchy ("level1", "level2") to "source" and "target" fields, but then it doesn't fit the visual's structure/needed parameters.
Anyone faced this issue before? Any smart idea how to solve it?
Thanks in advance 🙂
Amit
Hi @amitg ,
You need to create a parent-child hierarchy calculation.
Check the links below:
https://www.daxpatterns.com/parent-child-hierarchies/
https://www.sqlbi.com/blog/alberto/2011/07/19/parent-child-hierarchies-in-tabular-with-denali/
Regards
Miguel Félix
Proud to be a Super User!
Check out my blog: Power BI em PortuguêsIf you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 53 | |
| 40 | |
| 38 | |
| 19 | |
| 18 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 70 | |
| 69 | |
| 34 | |
| 33 | |
| 30 |