The ultimate Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community-led learning event. Save €200 with code FABCOMM.
Get registeredCompete to become Power BI Data Viz World Champion! First round ends August 18th. Get started.
Hi All!
I'm struggling with a recent model that uses multiple What if parameters to allow the user to forecast future employee head counts. My data table is a list of current employees that fall within various category combinations and the user wants to be able to project each of these category combinations individually over a multiple year projection. I've created an example .pbix that shows the issue I'm running into but I don't see an option to upload attachments. Does anyone know how I can do this?
In this example, each employee falls into a category combination of country, state and level. I only included the first 6 category combinations and a year 1 projection for the example, but my real use-case includes over 400 different combinations of categories, resulting in over 400 what-if parameters. In that dashboard, the updates to visuals (bar charts, tables, matrix) now takes over a minute to update with every change to a parameter.
My questions are:
Is there a better way than multiple what-if parameters to allow the user control over selecting their estimate for head counts at each combination of categories?
Is my measure for Year 1 projection not efficient and that's what is causing the slowdown?
Is there a better way to go about this than my current model design?
Thank you in advance for the help and guidance!
Below is the measure I'm currently using for my year 1 projection.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @SeanI
Can you please try to also put...
SUM('Data Table'[Current Count])
... in a separate variable.
It might be that in each measure this is calcualted multiple time instead of one time. So the formulal would look like:
Year 1 =
var var_Sum = SUM('Data Table'[Current Count])
var CAExperienceHire
= var_Sum +('CA Experienced Hire'[CA Experienced Hire Value])
var CAIntern
= var_Sum +('CA Intern'[CA Intern Value])
var CANewHire
= var_Sum +('CA New Hire'[CA New Hire Value])
var CAProfessional
= var_Sum +('CA Professional'[CA Professional Value])
var CASemiPro
= var_Sum +('CA Semi-Pro'[CA Semi-Pro Value])
var CASubjectMatterExpert
= var_Sum +('CA Subject Matter Expert'[CA Subject Matter Expert Value])
Return
SWITCH(TRUE(),
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=1,CAExperienceHire,
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=2,CAIntern,
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=3,CANewHire,
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=4,CAProfessional,
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=5,CASemiPro,
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=6,CASubjectMatterExpert,var_Sum))
So if I am right there should be less redundant calculation. But also if it does not speed up your measure it still simplifies it 🙂
Best regards
Michael
-----------------------------------------------------
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly. Appreciate your thumbs up!
@ me in replies or I'll lose your thread.
Thanks @Mikelytics I will definitely try that first. I also upaloded my pbix to OneDrive below, I think 🙂
Hi @SeanI
Can you please try to also put...
SUM('Data Table'[Current Count])
... in a separate variable.
It might be that in each measure this is calcualted multiple time instead of one time. So the formulal would look like:
Year 1 =
var var_Sum = SUM('Data Table'[Current Count])
var CAExperienceHire
= var_Sum +('CA Experienced Hire'[CA Experienced Hire Value])
var CAIntern
= var_Sum +('CA Intern'[CA Intern Value])
var CANewHire
= var_Sum +('CA New Hire'[CA New Hire Value])
var CAProfessional
= var_Sum +('CA Professional'[CA Professional Value])
var CASemiPro
= var_Sum +('CA Semi-Pro'[CA Semi-Pro Value])
var CASubjectMatterExpert
= var_Sum +('CA Subject Matter Expert'[CA Subject Matter Expert Value])
Return
SWITCH(TRUE(),
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=1,CAExperienceHire,
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=2,CAIntern,
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=3,CANewHire,
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=4,CAProfessional,
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=5,CASemiPro,
average('Data Table'[Mapping])=6,CASubjectMatterExpert,var_Sum))
So if I am right there should be less redundant calculation. But also if it does not speed up your measure it still simplifies it 🙂
Best regards
Michael
-----------------------------------------------------
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly. Appreciate your thumbs up!
@ me in replies or I'll lose your thread.