October 28 & 29: Experts share their secrets on how to pass the Fabric Analytics Engineer certification exam—live. Learn more
Hoping someone can help, I'm working on a report which has two tables which cannot be joined by relationship. The first is a list of server sizes with CPU cores and memory. The second table is also list of servers with a number of cores and memory (which will have a slicer with just the server names to filter single value).
What I'd like to be able to do is have a filter to strip out the server sizes from the first table which are not relevant. So for example,
if the cores from table 2 is 8 then ,
bring back =>8, then filter those with have memory of =>2
Can anyone advise of a way to do this? I'm struggle to get the meaure to make it work with it not being in a relationship.
Thanks in advanced,
Kind Regards,
Raf
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @RafDelgado,
In your second table, create a measure using the following formula.
s = IF(HASONEVALUE(t2[CoreCount]),VALUES(t2[CoreCount]),BLANK())
In your first table, create a measure using the following formula.
checkresult = IF(MAX(t1[CPU cores])>=[s]&&MAX(t1[Memory:GB])>=2,1,0)
Create a table visual shown in the following screenshot. And create a slicer using CoreCount field of second table.
Set the value of the slicer to 8, then set value of checkresult measure to 1 in visual level filter, you will get expected result.
Thanks,
Lydia Zhang
Hi @RafDelgado,
In your second table, create a measure using the following formula.
s = IF(HASONEVALUE(t2[CoreCount]),VALUES(t2[CoreCount]),BLANK())
In your first table, create a measure using the following formula.
checkresult = IF(MAX(t1[CPU cores])>=[s]&&MAX(t1[Memory:GB])>=2,1,0)
Create a table visual shown in the following screenshot. And create a slicer using CoreCount field of second table.
Set the value of the slicer to 8, then set value of checkresult measure to 1 in visual level filter, you will get expected result.
Thanks,
Lydia Zhang
Hi @v-yuezhe-msft,
Thank you for replying, this is perfect to get me started, I ended up making the changes in the query editor via a column merge but this is so much better.
Thanks again ,
Raf
User | Count |
---|---|
103 | |
97 | |
96 | |
85 | |
49 |
User | Count |
---|---|
162 | |
142 | |
132 | |
102 | |
63 |