Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!To celebrate FabCon Vienna, we are offering 50% off select exams. Ends October 3rd. Request your discount now.
Hello everyone,
I have two tables, from different data sources, and I need to match them. There is no simple id match, instead there are multiple fields, and I need to keep only those combinations, which match completely.
Ideally, I want something like this:
But as far as I understand, I cannot make muliple many-to-many relationships between two tables, Power BI says it's ambigious.
Instead, what I can do, is make a table of unique combinations of fields that I need to match, and make a single connection by this field. But it makes my solution slow and big. Something like this:
Is there a way how I can make it option 1, and not option 2? Please help
@AlexeyRusinov wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have two tables, from different data sources, and I need to match them. There is no simple id match, instead there are multiple fields, and I need to keep only those combinations, which match completely.
Ideally, I want something like this:
But as far as I understand, I cannot make muliple many-to-many relationships between two tables, Power BI says it's ambigious.
Instead, what I can do, is make a table of unique combinations of fields that I need to match, and make a single connection by this field. But it makes my solution slow and big. Something like this:
Is there a way how I can make it option 1, and not option 2? Please help
Your understanding is correct, the option 1 is not a correct relationship, not only in Power BI. I don't know what exactly the problem when using Option 2 in your case, however you could also try
User | Count |
---|---|
98 | |
76 | |
74 | |
49 | |
26 |