Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!View all the Fabric Data Days sessions on demand. View schedule
Solved! Go to Solution.
hi @Anonymous
When you conect to a shared power bi dataset, it is a live connection model.
So the only modeling that you could only create report level measure in this report.
For the same name measure, it could not achieve in power bi, I think add a flag in the measure name is a good way.
Regards,
Lin
@Anonymous , just check if this possible in power bi Dataset
in the model view, you can create a subfolder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9oDIL8nbu0&list=PLPaNVDMhUXGYrm5rm6ME6rjzKGSvT9Jmy&index=3
Thanks for the suggestion , but no that deosnt seem possible in a report using a differant power bi dataset. The option is greyed out.
I could build in blank folders etc in the dataset of local report writers using them. But thats far from ideal as I wont know who may set up a report on it.
Also the idea of how I go about centralising measures again and possible name conflicts still is a question?
hi @Anonymous
When you conect to a shared power bi dataset, it is a live connection model.
So the only modeling that you could only create report level measure in this report.
For the same name measure, it could not achieve in power bi, I think add a flag in the measure name is a good way.
Regards,
Lin
Thanks - I tested the measure with the same name. So any measure created centrally with teh same name as a local measure, results in the local one breaking. So visuals using it no longer work. You must delete the local measure to use the central one.
Looks like naming conventions and or a centrally added table or folder for local variables may be needed. Thanks
Check out the November 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Advance your Data & AI career with 50 days of live learning, contests, hands-on challenges, study groups & certifications and more!