Join us for an expert-led overview of the tools and concepts you'll need to pass exam PL-300. The first session starts on June 11th. See you there!
Get registeredPower BI is turning 10! Let’s celebrate together with dataviz contests, interactive sessions, and giveaways. Register now.
Hello everyone,
I have 2 tables and both have client numbers.
Table1 are much larger and is for normal clients.
Table2 have only special clients.
I need a third table with just the client numbers from the 2 tables, containing only distinct client numbers. Its possible have duplicities of client numbers on Table1 and Table2, because a existing normal client can be upgrade to special client anytime, or demoted from special to normal.
I would like to have a join of those 2 summarizes, resulting in a Table3 with distinct values of all client codes.
Summarize ( Table1 ; Table1[client code] )
Summarize ( Table2 ; Table2[client code] )
Solved! Go to Solution.
UniqueClientID = UNION(DISTINCT(Table1[Client Code]);DISTINCT(Table2[Client Code]))
This way its still bringing a new table where i have "duplicities".
Distinct table1[client] = only distinct clients from table1
Distinct table2[client] = only distinct clients from table2
In here, considering those 2 distinct tables, they still have duplicities between them, and excuting the union is bringing more or less 30 clients with 2 ocurrences on the "uniqueclientID" table.
Table 3 = SUMMARIZE(UNION( 'Table 1','Table 2'),[client code])
I dont know if im making something wrong trying to write this code, but when writing [client code], its forcing me to select the client code from the Table1. Trying to run this code is also giving me a error, i will try to translate from ptbr here, "all the arguments in the UNION table should have the same number of columns.
I greatful to you both, analysing the 2 suggestion helped me to understand better what i needed and helped to write something that worked.
Table3 = DISTINCT( UNION( SUMMARIZE(Table1;Table1[client code]); SUMMARIZE(Table2;Table2[client code])))
Hi @bolabuga,
Please try this:
Table 3 = SUMMARIZE(UNION( 'Table 1','Table 2'),[client code])
Best regards,
Yuliana Gu
Hi @bolabuga,
Create a calculate table using the following code:
UniqueClientID = UNION(DISTINCT(Table1[Client Code]);DISTINCT(Table2[Client Code]))
Regards,
MFelix
Regards
Miguel Félix
Proud to be a Super User!
Check out my blog: Power BI em Português
UniqueClientID = UNION(DISTINCT(Table1[Client Code]);DISTINCT(Table2[Client Code]))
This way its still bringing a new table where i have "duplicities".
Distinct table1[client] = only distinct clients from table1
Distinct table2[client] = only distinct clients from table2
In here, considering those 2 distinct tables, they still have duplicities between them, and excuting the union is bringing more or less 30 clients with 2 ocurrences on the "uniqueclientID" table.
Table 3 = SUMMARIZE(UNION( 'Table 1','Table 2'),[client code])
I dont know if im making something wrong trying to write this code, but when writing [client code], its forcing me to select the client code from the Table1. Trying to run this code is also giving me a error, i will try to translate from ptbr here, "all the arguments in the UNION table should have the same number of columns.
I greatful to you both, analysing the 2 suggestion helped me to understand better what i needed and helped to write something that worked.
Table3 = DISTINCT( UNION( SUMMARIZE(Table1;Table1[client code]); SUMMARIZE(Table2;Table2[client code])))
This is your chance to engage directly with the engineering team behind Fabric and Power BI. Share your experiences and shape the future.
Check out the June 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
76 | |
75 | |
56 | |
38 | |
34 |
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
56 | |
51 | |
44 | |
40 |