Microsoft is giving away 50,000 FREE Microsoft Certification exam vouchers. Get Fabric certified for FREE! Learn more
I'm trying to create a measure that will Sum the forecasted and actual proceeds a client receives for all of the companies they own. Data model is structured in a star schema with Clients as the fact table and all other tables as dimensional.
Data Model:
DimSubCompanies
FactClients
DimPaymentActual
DimPaymentForecasted
The table I'm trying to make should look like this
SubCompanyName | Forecasted Net to Client | Actual Net to Client |
SubCompany1 | 100 | 0 |
SubCompany2 | 500 | |
SubCompany3 | 250 | 250 |
Instead the current table I have looks like more like this where it's summing the entire client across all the companies they own.
SubCompanyName | Forecasted Net to Client | Actual Net to Client |
SubCompany1 | 850 | 250 |
SubCompany2 | 850 | 250 |
SubCompany3 | 850 | 250 |
How can I get my table to look like the first one?
Hi! In a star schema the DIM tables are the 1 side on 1:M. Your fact table should be the many and ideally, avoid bi-directional joins.
Is Client ID the key for Sub-category? What granularity level is that dim table at? What level of granularity is actual and forecast at?
Proud to be a Super User! | |
It's been a while since I've done this, you are correct maybe I should look at restructuring my model.
ClientID is a FK for the Client table that contains various information about the client (name, location, email, etc.). The actual and forecasted tables are granular to a specific transaction and I can see what they should have received and actually received for every transaction that occurred.
Check out the March 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Explore and share Fabric Notebooks to boost Power BI insights in the new community notebooks gallery.
User | Count |
---|---|
92 | |
64 | |
56 | |
46 | |
45 |