Power BI is turning 10, and we’re marking the occasion with a special community challenge. Use your creativity to tell a story, uncover trends, or highlight something unexpected.
Get startedJoin us for an expert-led overview of the tools and concepts you'll need to become a Certified Power BI Data Analyst and pass exam PL-300. Register now.
Hi Everyone,
Requesting you post the solutin or any advice for the below question.
TABLE1
EMP ID | SALARY | SAVINGS | EXPENSES | TAX PAID |
1 | 10000 | 1000 | 9000 | 500 |
2 | 5000 | 1500 | 3500 | 600 |
3 | 15000 | 5000 | 10000 | 700 |
4 | 8000 | 2400 | 5400 | 350 |
5 | 9000 | 3200 | 5700 | 550 |
6 | 7500 | 800 | 6700 | 700 |
7 | 6000 | 500 | 5500 | 800 |
Slicer 1
Metric (Drop down Silcer) |
SALARY |
SAVINGS |
EXPENSES |
TAX PAID |
Slicer 2
Sort (Radio Button Slicer) |
ASC |
DSC |
Above is the TABLE1 consists of Columns SALARY, SAVINGS, EXPENSES, TAXPAID and there need two slicers like as above Slicer 1 and Slicer .
Now the requirement is if i select one Metric from Metric Slicer Ex. SAVINGS and selected ASC then the SAVINGS Column in the table should sort in Ascending order and if select DSC then it should sort in the Descending Order in the Same table without any Bookmarks.
Finally based on the Selection of Metric in Metric Slicer and Selection of Sort Slicer the Metric Value in the Table should Sort Accordingly.
Help me out with closest solution.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Pentakoa
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @Anonymous ,
You can try this measure
SORT =
SWITCH (
SELECTEDVALUE ( 'Slicer 2'[Sort] ),
"ASC",
SWITCH (
SELECTEDVALUE ( 'Slicer 1'[Metric] ),
"EXPENSES", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [EXPENSESASC] ),
"SALARY", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [SALARYASC] ),
"SAVINGS", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [SAVINGSASC] ),
"TAX PAID", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [TAX PAIDASC] )
),
"DSC",
SWITCH (
SELECTEDVALUE ( 'Slicer 1'[Metric] ),
"EXPENSES", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [EXPENSESDESC] ),
"SALARY", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [SALARYDESC] ),
"SAVINGS", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [SAVINGSDESC] ),
"TAX PAID", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [TAX PAIDDESC] )
)
)
You can check more details from here.
Best Regards,
Stephen Tao
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi @Anonymous ,
You can try this measure
SORT =
SWITCH (
SELECTEDVALUE ( 'Slicer 2'[Sort] ),
"ASC",
SWITCH (
SELECTEDVALUE ( 'Slicer 1'[Metric] ),
"EXPENSES", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [EXPENSESASC] ),
"SALARY", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [SALARYASC] ),
"SAVINGS", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [SAVINGSASC] ),
"TAX PAID", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [TAX PAIDASC] )
),
"DSC",
SWITCH (
SELECTEDVALUE ( 'Slicer 1'[Metric] ),
"EXPENSES", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [EXPENSESDESC] ),
"SALARY", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [SALARYDESC] ),
"SAVINGS", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [SAVINGSDESC] ),
"TAX PAID", SUMX ( 'TABLE1', [TAX PAIDDESC] )
)
)
You can check more details from here.
Best Regards,
Stephen Tao
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi @amitchandak Is there any solution for the same without using any Bookmarks?
No. It should be only in a slicer
Hi, I found this solutions is something close . Can you please look into it and help me.
https://community.powerbi.com/t5/Desktop/Sort-order-with-multiple-columns-of-slicer/m-p/611430
https://community.powerbi.com/t5/Desktop/Sort-order-with-multiple-columns-of-slicer/m-p/611430
This is your chance to engage directly with the engineering team behind Fabric and Power BI. Share your experiences and shape the future.
Check out the June 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
77 | |
73 | |
58 | |
35 | |
31 |
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
57 | |
56 | |
46 | |
40 |