Get certified for free when you join Fabric Data Days 2026 and dive into Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI, and other essential data skills.
Join nowTry your skills in the Power BI Dataviz World Championship! Round one ends June 26. Join now
Let's say there are three levels of object and there could be two possible way of relationships
Strategy -> Project -> securities -> Facts
Strategy ------------->securities -> Facts
There is a common table currently storing securities transactions. PowerBI doesn't allow me to create these two active relationship concurrently. Have you guys seen anything like this before and what's the best way to deal with it?
What i can think of is to break Facts into two table one for each kind of realtionship. But this would make reporting incomplete. For example if i want a table having the total value of the two. Thank you very much.
Hi @Anonymous
Given what you've described, I would be tempted to join Strategy, Project and Securities into a single dimension table "Securities".
The joined Securities table would follow this structure:
| Strategy | Project | Securities | Source table | |||
| Strategy Key | Strategy Cols | Project Key | Project Cols | Securities Key | Securities Cols | |
| Strat_001 | <…> | Proj_001 | <…> | Sec_001 | <…> | Project nonblank |
| Strat_002 | <…> | Proj_002 | <…> | Sec_002 | <…> | |
| Strat_003 | <…> | (blank) | (blank) | Sec_003 | <…> | Project blank |
| Strat_004 | <…> | (blank) | (blank) | Sec_004 | <…> | |
In cases wher Project is not part of the original relationship, the Project columns in the joined table would be blank.
Is there any reason why this wouldn't work, given how you are using the model for reporting?
Please post back with more detail if needed.
Regards
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 22 | |
| 21 | |
| 20 | |
| 20 | |
| 11 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 62 | |
| 55 | |
| 46 | |
| 45 | |
| 34 |