Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-600) exam for FREE! Find out how by attending the DP-600 session on April 23rd (pacific time), live or on-demand.
Learn moreNext up in the FabCon + SQLCon recap series: The roadmap for Microsoft SQL and Maximizing Developer experiences in Fabric. All sessions are available on-demand after the live show. Register now
Hi,
I am reposting this question from another thread regarding horizontal fusion that was closed.
Has anyone been able to test this feature successfully yet?
I have tested some queries in DAX Studio while connected to a dataset with Horizontal Fusion disabled. Then enabled the feature, restarted Power BI, connected to the dataset and run the same query.
Time elasped is the same.
Number of queries sent off is the same.
Could be the queries I am running but just want to double check that someone has actually had success in testing this feature?
My dataset is connected via DirectQuery to SQL Server.
We have Premium P1 SKU - I haven't heard any feedback on improved performance either.
Alberto at SQLBI has just put up a video on Youtube explaining it using DAX Studio to show how it can help.
Introducing horizontal fusion in DAX - YouTube
Hi @ML222 ,
As far as I know, Horizontal Fusion should be a preview feature. There may be some drawbacks in this function.
I think you may submit your feedback at the end of below blog. If there are many users facing the same issues, Power BI Team will fix these issues in future updates.
For reference:
Best Regards,
Rico Zhou
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 48 | |
| 45 | |
| 41 | |
| 20 | |
| 17 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 69 | |
| 63 | |
| 32 | |
| 31 | |
| 25 |