This time we’re going bigger than ever. Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI and more. We're covering it all. You won't want to miss it.
Learn moreDid you hear? There's a new SQL AI Developer certification (DP-800). Start preparing now and be one of the first to get certified. Register now
I have this measure (COST_PROJECTION) that takes ages to load and I'm pretty sure there are some easy optimizations to be done.
Basically, for each RESOURCE_CATEGORY (the finest grain), on every day, if there are quantities (QUANTITY_CUM) and costs (COST_CUM) I want to calculate the COST_PROJECTION_REAL, otherwise the COST_PROJECTION_ESTIMATED. Then those values are summed up (resource category < activity < project).
Here are the formulas :
COST_PROJECTION:=
SUMX (
ALLSELECTED ( FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[ID_DIM_RESOURCE_CATEGORY] ) ;
IF (
( [QUANTITY_CUM] > 0 ) && not ISBLANK ( [COST_CUM]) ;
[UNIT_COST_CUM] * [QUANTITY_PLANNED_PROJECT]; /*COST_PROJECTION_REAL*/
[COST_CUM] + [COST_PLANNED_PROJECT] /*COST_PROJECTION_ESTIMATED*/
)
)
QUANTITY_CUM :=
IF(
min(DIM_DATE[THE_DATE]) <= CALCULATE ( MAX ( FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[THE_DATE] ); ALL ( FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY ) ) +1;
SUMX(
FILTER(
ALL(DIM_DATE[THE_DATE]);
DIM_DATE[THE_DATE] <= max(DIM_DATE[THE_DATE])
);
[QUANTITY]
)
)
QUANTITY:=
SUMX(
GROUPBY(
FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY;
FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[ID_DIM_ACTIVITY];
FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[ID_DIM_PROJECT];
FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[ID_DIM_DATE];
"QTY";
MINX(CURRENTGROUP();[QUANTITY_RES_CAT_PERIOD_COL])
);
[QTY]
)
UNIT_COST_CUM :=
(DIVIDE([COST_CUM]; [QUANTITY_CUM];0)
COST_CUM :=
IF(
min(DIM_DATE[THE_DATE]) <= CALCULATE ( MAX ( FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[THE_DATE] ); ALL ( FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY ) ) +1;
SUMX(
FILTER(
ALL(DIM_DATE[THE_DATE]);
DIM_DATE[THE_DATE] <= max(DIM_DATE[THE_DATE])
);
FIRSTNONBLANK(FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[COST_PERIOD_COL];1)
)
)
QUANTITY_PLANNED_PROJECT:=
SUMX(
SUMMARIZE(
FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY;
FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[ID_DIM_ACTIVITY];
FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[ID_DIM_PROJECT]
);
FIRSTNONBLANK(FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[QUANTITY_BUDGET_COL];1)
)
COST_PLANNED_PROJECT:=
SUMX(
SUMMARIZE(
FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY;
FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[ID_DIM_PROJECT];
FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[ID_DIM_ACTIVITY];
FACT_COST_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[ID_DIM_RESOURCE_CATEGORY];
"COST PLANNED PROJECT";
FIRSTNONBLANK(DIM_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[COST_EQUIPMENT_BUDGET];1)
+
FIRSTNONBLANK(DIM_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[COST_LABOR_BUDGET];1)
+
FIRSTNONBLANK(DIM_RESOURCE_CATEGORY[COST_UNIT_BUDGET];1)
);
[COST PLANNED PROJECT]
)
NOTE that quantities are semi-additives. They're at the activity level.
HI @Anonymous,
I found you are lots of iterators calculation functions in your formulas, if your table contains huge amount of records, it obviously will cause the performance issue.
In addition, when you combo use if statement and iterators functions will increase looping amount.(e.g COST_CUM measure. iterator functions will loop all rows in expression table. It means functions will loop multiple times when you use it in if statement: row count which suitable for the conditionals * dimdate table row count)
Reference links:
Optimizing nested iterators in DAX
Optimizing DAX with cardinality estimation: computing working days
Regards,
Xiaoxin Sheng
Check out the April 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Sign up to receive a private message when registration opens and key events begin.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 34 | |
| 31 | |
| 25 | |
| 20 | |
| 16 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 61 | |
| 49 | |
| 28 | |
| 23 | |
| 23 |