Forum Discussion
Forecast V Actual Comparison Table
Hi TheG,
In your scenario, since FORECASTPF table and ACTUALPF table almost have the same table structure, you needn't to use two tables. You can add then into one table with FORECAST and ACTUAL column. Select Combine > Merge Queries from the Home tab on the ribbon.
Regards,
Charlie Liao
Thanks v-caliao-msft
When i merge i dont get the complete matches probably as some account numbers are not in both tables...i guess i need to rework the table layout and split account numbers out, jobs, account names etc..
- Anonymous9 years agoNot applicable
As noted above and based on the sample data screenshot, merging Actuals and Forecast could be problematic - you have multiple Actual records for July 2014, but only 1 Forecast record that I can see for that month.
- TheG9 years ago
Advocate I
HI Anonymous yep i think i need to re-organise my tables design.
- Anonymous9 years agoNot applicable
If this is more than a once-off analysis, I suggest stepping back briefly and deciding what you want to measure and visualise, and how flexible for future change it needs to be. Then re-organise tables to suit - e.g. if you're only going to ever want monthly comparisons (not fortnightly, or drill down to individual Actual records), you might consider summarising Actual records to monthly granularity for your measures. If you do decide on that, Charlie's v-caliao-msftsuggestion about joining the tables could then make for a simpler model to analyse.