Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-700) exam on us!
Learn moreWe've captured the moments from FabCon & SQLCon that everyone is talking about, and we are bringing them to the community, live and on-demand. Starts on April 14th. Register now
Hi, I am confused. I can filter against the cardinality of the relationship while I should not.
The situation is the following. I have 3 talbes (Table1 - T1 and so forth). T1- Personal_Data: employee_name, age, etc., T2- Employees: ID, employee_name, etc., T3- Children: employee_name, name_of_the_child (T3 is only for employees with children). Thus, T1 to T2 is one-to-one and T2 to T3 is one-to-many (one way cadinality from T2 to T3 - NOT bidirectional). And surprisingly I can make charts with data from T3 to T2 direction. In particular, I can make a chart with T3.employee_name and T1.age. And as far as I know, I should not be able to do so due to cardinality from T2 to T3 and not vice versa. I am using a version 2.129.1229.0 64-bit (May 2024). Is it working properly?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Yes, a reverse implied filter is possible. Technically, the T1 table filters T2 which filters T3. Only matching records are retained.
Yes, a reverse implied filter is possible. Technically, the T1 table filters T2 which filters T3. Only matching records are retained.
Thank You!
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 51 | |
| 37 | |
| 35 | |
| 19 | |
| 17 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 72 | |
| 70 | |
| 39 | |
| 34 | |
| 23 |