Microsoft Fabric Community Conference 2025, March 31 - April 2, Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount.
Register nowGet certified as a Fabric Data Engineer: Check your eligibility for a 50% exam voucher offer and join us for free live learning sessions to get prepared for Exam DP-700. Get started
I have two (DirectQuery) detail tables, with an (imported) aggregation table based on them, but: when attempting to configure aggregation management in PowerBI, it throws this error:
"Detail column cannot be aggregated to one or more Group By columns using strong relationships."
The problem is that this error throws even when I modify (or at least I think I modify) every table related to the detail tables so that they should not be strongly-related to anything else in the model. The only table that appears like it could even possibly be strongly-related to either detail table is dim_Tenant, but changing its storage mode to Import (which I would expect to change its relationships to the detail tables to weak) has no effect on the error:
So actually, never mind on this problem for now... while I'm fairly certain that it should be possible to link an agg table to multiple DirectQuery detail tables, I suspect that the way I was trying to do it here (i.e. no relationship between the detail tables) was the problem. I'm going to try some experiments with cleaner data warehouse data (e.g. Worldwide Importing) -- where the data lends itself to a direct relationship between detail tables -- and see if I'm right.
Hi @LastThird
could you share your sample file after removing sensitive information? I will test it later.
Best Regards,
Community Support Team _ Tang
If this post helps, please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Prices go up Feb. 11th.
If you love stickers, then you will definitely want to check out our Community Sticker Challenge!
User | Count |
---|---|
146 | |
72 | |
63 | |
52 | |
51 |
User | Count |
---|---|
208 | |
91 | |
62 | |
59 | |
56 |