Earn a 50% discount on the DP-600 certification exam by completing the Fabric 30 Days to Learn It challenge.
Hey there,
I have got a small problem and can't find a solution. I would like to represent a geographical organization of different companies in a map. In the main table I have all company locations with location type (e.g. field service center, main supply center, ...). The dependencies between these locations are stored in an additional table with one column for the underlying location and another column for the managing location.
The goal is to have a map in which only all managing locations are shown. Then you choose a managing location and should be able to drill down to all underlying service locations.
I am able to create different views for this task (e.g. one view representing all managing locations and another one representing the underlying locations with a reference to the managing location). As a boundary condition I assume that all underlying locations have only one managing location and there is a clean cut between managing and underlying locations.
Maybe someone had a similar issue and could provide a solution.
Beste regards
Hi Henry @v-henryk-mstf ,
thank you for your answer. I have tested your solution but I can't apply the last step. The location information I have in my dataset is only given in longitude and latitude. Thus I can't add them to the location information.
I am able to create a map with all managing locations from the whole location dataset by adding a filter to the managing location.
Following you can find an example dataset for the location structure.
Could you be so kind to evaluate your last step a bit more?
ShopID | ShopName | ShopLat | ShopLon | ShopType |
1 | FieldCenter1 | 8,88772 | 52,75792 | small |
2 | FieldCenter2 | 8,79807 | 52,50369 | small |
3 | FieldCenter3 | 9,53903 | 52,10057 | small |
4 | FieldCenter4 | 9,15665 | 51,94435 | small |
5 | FieldCenter5 | 8,9503 | 52,3025 | small |
6 | FieldCenter6 | 9,2036 | 51,852 | small |
7 | FieldCenter7 | 9,25213 | 52,75792 | small |
8 | FieldCenter8 | 8,9988 | 52,50369 | small |
9 | MainCenter1 | 8,8216 | 52,10057 | big |
10 | MainCenter2 | 9,1058 | 51,94435 | big |
11 | MainCenter3 | 9,4421 | 52,3025 | big |
12 | MainCenter4 | 9,493 | 51,852 | big |
13 | MainCenter5 | 9,035 | 52,4204 | big |
ManagingShopID | UnderlyingShopID | ConnectionType |
9 | 1 | Supply |
10 | 2 | Supply |
9 | 3 | Supply |
11 | 4 | Supply |
10 | 5 | Supply |
11 | 6 | Supply |
13 | 7 | Supply |
12 | 8 | Supply |
Best Regards,
Robin
Hi @RobKWW ,
To create a map in Power BI that shows only the managing locations and allows you to drill down to the underlying locations, you can follow these steps:
You can also use other Power BI features, such as slicers and visual interactions, to further customize the map and make it easier to navigate and explore the data. For example, you could use a slicer to filter the managing locations shown on the map, or you could use visual interactions to enable users to click on a managing location on the map to see the underlying locations for that location.
If the problem is still not resolved, please provide detailed error information and test sample data. Looking forward to your reply.
Best Regards,
Henry
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
User | Count |
---|---|
101 | |
90 | |
78 | |
70 | |
69 |
User | Count |
---|---|
110 | |
96 | |
95 | |
74 | |
71 |