Microsoft is giving away 50,000 FREE Microsoft Certification exam vouchers. Get Fabric certified for FREE! Learn more
Hi everyone,
I'm currently facing a challenge in Power BI and would appreciate some advice from the community.
I have three tables in my dataset:
The relationships are currently set up through the Calendar Table. However, I cannot create direct relationships between Table A and Table B because it creates ambiguity due to the existing relationships through the Calendar Table.
Key Challenges:
I’ve tried several workarounds like concatenating fields to create unique keys, but they often feel like hacks and are not very efficient. I am looking for best practices or solutions that others have successfully implemented in similar scenarios.
Example of the Structure:
Current Relationships:
The problem arises because I need to compare the actual transactions from Table A with the targets from Table B, and the relationships through the Calendar Table do not suffice due to different granularities.
Question: How do you manage these types of relationships and calculations in Power BI without resorting to inefficient workarounds? Are there best practices for handling such scenarios where table granularities differ and direct relationships cause ambiguity?
Any advice or examples of how you've tackled similar issues would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you in advance!
Solved! Go to Solution.
I think you need an Advisor dimension in your data model to relate to Table A and Table B (like the date dimension does). I've attached an example .pbix file here.
I think you need an Advisor dimension in your data model to relate to Table A and Table B (like the date dimension does). I've attached an example .pbix file here.
Check out the April 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Explore and share Fabric Notebooks to boost Power BI insights in the new community notebooks gallery.
User | Count |
---|---|
75 | |
72 | |
69 | |
45 | |
41 |
User | Count |
---|---|
63 | |
41 | |
30 | |
28 | |
28 |