Power BI is turning 10, and we’re marking the occasion with a special community challenge. Use your creativity to tell a story, uncover trends, or highlight something unexpected.
Get startedJoin us for an expert-led overview of the tools and concepts you'll need to become a Certified Power BI Data Analyst and pass exam PL-300. Register now.
Hi,
I'm working on a report, which uses kpis from up to 10 different data sources. There are some data preparation steps I do in R.
Most of the kpis share the dimensions, so my question is, whether its better to build 2-3 tables which contain all the kpis with shared dimensions or if each source should be represented by a table in power bi.
The highest priority for me is performance. Is there a huge difference between the two approaches? For the first approach i would use relations between the tables to be able to use slicers for the common dimensions.
tldr: is there a big perfomance difference between few but wide tables and many but more narrow tables with relationships?
thanks in advance!
I tend to go with simpler is better. Tabular tends to like denormalizing the data into one big fact table.
This is your chance to engage directly with the engineering team behind Fabric and Power BI. Share your experiences and shape the future.
Check out the June 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
72 | |
70 | |
55 | |
38 | |
31 |
User | Count |
---|---|
78 | |
64 | |
64 | |
49 | |
45 |