Check your eligibility for this 50% exam voucher offer and join us for free live learning sessions to get prepared for Exam DP-700.
Get StartedDon't miss out! 2025 Microsoft Fabric Community Conference, March 31 - April 2, Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount. Prices go up February 11th. Register now.
I have 2 related tables:
'Contract' with a looooong list of contracts conducted
'Contract_UdF' a table accounting for some user defined fields that could not be added to the general data structure.
Records in the UdF table are linked by the foreign key [CONTRACT_ID].
Particular items are identified by [NAME] (e.g. "Inst Type"). [VALUE] then contains the actual data.
I need a measure with the overall COUNT of records in 'Contract' that do NOT have a corresponding record in 'Contract_Udf'
with [NAME] = "Inst Type".
Example:
I have 4 contracts in the 'Contract' table. They have corresponding records in the related table 'Contract_UdF'.
[CONTRACT_ID] 100000001, 100000003 and 100000004 have a record wiht [NAME] = "Inst Type".
But 100000002 does NOT.
The value of the measure shall be 1.
THANKS FOR YOU HELP!
Best regards,
Jan
Solved! Go to Solution.
@JSiebrecht , Try a measure like
countx(filter(summarize(Contract_udf, contract[contract], "_1", countrows(filter(Contract_udf, Contract_udf[Name] = "Inst Type"))+0), [_1]=0), [contract])
Hi @amitchandak
thanks for the prompt response.
With the small typological adjustment (in pink below) it works fine! Many thanks.
Checking the results maually I found a glitch in my thinking though.
How do I need to adjust the measure if Inot only want to count the non-existing records
but also the existing records with [NAME] = "Inst Type" but a blank [VALUE]?I
I suppose simply add the additional filter (in green) like so, isn't it?!?
@JSiebrecht , Try a measure like
countx(filter(summarize(Contract_udf, contract[contract], "_1", countrows(filter(Contract_udf, Contract_udf[Name] = "Inst Type"))+0), [_1]=0), [contract])
Hi @amitchandak
thanks for the prompt response.
With the small typological adjustment (in pink below) it works fine! Many thanks.
Checking the results maually I found a glitch in my thinking though.
How do I need to adjust the measure if Inot only want to count the non-existing records
but also the existing records with [NAME] = "Inst Type" but a blank [VALUE]?I
I suppose simply add the additional filter (in green) like so, isn't it?!?
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Check out the January 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features in Reporting, Modeling, and Data Connectivity.
User | Count |
---|---|
97 | |
69 | |
46 | |
39 | |
33 |
User | Count |
---|---|
163 | |
110 | |
61 | |
51 | |
40 |