Combine switch functions - hierarchy

[Tribal]

I'm currently building a matrix visual where I'm using two tables given below (trending table and waterfall_switch_table) as a basis to switch to required variable using the following measure. 

Trending Measure = 
VAR B1 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B1]
    )
)

VAR B2 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B2]
    )
)

VAR B3 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B3]
    )
)

VAR B4 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B4]
    )
)

VAR B5 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B5]
    )
)

VAR B6 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B6]
    )
)

VAR B7 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B7]
    )
)

VAR B8 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B8]
    )
)

VAR B9 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B9]
    )
)

VAR B10 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B10]
    )
)

VAR B11 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B11]
    )
)

VAR B12 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B12]
    )
)

VAR B13 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[B13]
    )
)

VAR A1 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[A1]
    )
)

VAR A5 = 
CALCULATE(
    SUM(
        'Bridge Table (CMA05 - Budgetvolume)'[A2]
    )
)

VAR A2 =
B1 + B2 + B3 + B4 + B5 + B6 + B7

VAR A3 = 
B8 + B9 + B10

VAR A4 =
B11 + B12 + B13

RETURN
IF(
    ISINSCOPE(Trending[Sub var]),
    SWITCH (
        SELECTEDVALUE( Trending[ID] ),
        1, B1,
        2, B2,
        3, B3,
        4, B4,
        5, B5,
        6, B6,
        7, B7,
        8, B8,
        9, B9,
        10, B10,
        11, B11,
        12, B12,
        13, B13
    ),
    SWITCH (
        SELECTEDVALUE( Waterfall_SwitchTable[ID] ),
        1, A1,
        2, A2,
        3, A3,
        4, A4,
        5, A5
    )
)

This produces the following matrix, where the values are shown when expanded to level B. But consequently all level A values are hidden and will only be shown when the table is fully collapsed. I've been trying to combine these two switch functions, but haven't been able to unfortunately. Could someone steer me into the right direction to make this work?

Expanded:

Collapsed:

Trending table:

Waterfall_Switch_table:

Sample data - Budgetvolume table:

A1	A5	B1	B2	B3	B4	B5	B6	B7	B8	B9	B10	B11	B12	B13
20	30	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
20	30	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
20	30	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
20	30	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
20	30	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
20	30	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15

[lbendlin]

IF(
    ISINSCOPE(Trending[Sub measure]),

Measures are never in scope.

Please provide sample data (with sensitive information removed) that covers your issue or question completely, in a usable format (not as a screenshot). Leave out anything not related to the issue.
If you are unsure how to do that please refer to https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Community-Blog/How-to-provide-sample-data-in-the-Power-BI-...


https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Desktop/How-to-Get-Your-Question-Answered-Quickly/m-p/1447...

[Tribal]

Thank you for the feedback, in hindsight I see I didn't provide enough information. I changed the naming of all variables, tables, measures and values. So nothing is blacked out anymore and the entire measure is now visible.

Related to your reply regarding measures not being in scope. That would be correct, but I named the column a bit vaguely as it is not referring to a measure but the names of the variables. The provided value within 

IF(
    ISINSCOPE(Trending[Sub var]),

refers to a table[column] reference, so that shouldn't be the issue here

[lbendlin · Accepted solution]

Maybe you just need to re-enable row totals?

[Tribal]

O I feel kind of stupid now, I was trying to make the solution way too complicated. Thank you, that was it