Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!To celebrate FabCon Vienna, we are offering 50% off select exams. Ends October 3rd. Request your discount now.
Hi everyone,
I'm looking to define conventions for our team and this one I'm unsure about and unable to find much info.
Imagine I have the following dim tables in my PBI dataset:
In each of these tables, there are columns:
Is it generally better to fully define each field name, e.g. `Customer[Customer Code]`, `Location[Location Name]`, or keep them simple and without repetition, e.g. `Customer[Code]`?
My opinion on using longer names:
Because of the latter, I'm leaning into longer names at the moment.
Solved! Go to Solution.
@Willow0136 , We usually prefer full name like customer code. This make clear and easy to search
@Willow0136 , We usually prefer full name like customer code. This make clear and easy to search
User | Count |
---|---|
98 | |
76 | |
74 | |
49 | |
26 |