Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Column naming conventions for dim tables
05-28-2024
04:06 AM
Hi everyone,
I'm looking to define conventions for our team and this one I'm unsure about and unable to find much info.
Imagine I have the following dim tables in my PBI dataset:
- Customer
- Location
- Device
In each of these tables, there are columns:
- Code
- Name
- Description
Is it generally better to fully define each field name, e.g. `Customer[Customer Code]`, `Location[Location Name]`, or keep them simple and without repetition, e.g. `Customer[Code]`?
My opinion on using longer names:
- - Introduces repetition
- + May make it easier to search (if you search for `Customer Code` and the field is `Customer[Code]`, it will currently not show up)
Because of the latter, I'm leaning into longer names at the moment.
Solved! Go to Solution.
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-28-2024
04:28 AM
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-28-2024
04:28 AM

@Willow0136 , We usually prefer full name like customer code. This make clear and easy to search

Helpful resources
Recommendations
Subject | Author | Posted | |
---|---|---|---|
11-17-2022 09:00 PM | |||
07-17-2024 03:26 AM | |||
09-10-2024 07:53 AM | |||
05-13-2024 01:31 AM | |||
02-24-2023 12:39 AM |
Featured Topics
Top Kudoed Authors (Last Month)
User | Count |
---|---|
122 | |
107 | |
85 | |
52 | |
46 |