Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now! Learn more
I have a matrix like this:
The measure is Percent of Total Deal GCI Variance where I'm basically taking the percent of total deal GCI this year minus percent of total deal GCI from previous year:
Metric % Deal GCI Variance = DIVIDE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI] ),
CALCULATE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI] ),
ALLSELECTED ( 'Split Summary' )
)
)
- DIVIDE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI (Previous Year)] ),
CALCULATE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI (Previous Year)] ),
ALLSELECTED ( 'Split Summary' )
)
)
I'm suspecting the row totals are correct but not the column subtotals due to this measure using the ALLSELECTED() formula. Is there any workaround to this?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi, isnt that your expected outcome? Of the deals greater than $2m...there is a variance of -5.57%... resulting from a -0.77% in Cali, -1.31% in Southeast and so on?
Doing some SUMIFs in Excel seems to validate the measure results.
To resolve this, you can replace ALLSELECTED() with ALL(). This function removes all filters from the measure context, allowing for correct calculation of subtotals across all dimensions.
Revised Measure:
Metric % Deal GCI Variance =
DIVIDE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI] ),
CALCULATE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI] ),
ALL ( 'Split Summary' )
)
)
- DIVIDE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI (Previous Year)] ),
CALCULATE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI (Previous Year)] ),
ALL ( 'Split Summary' )
)
)
Explanation:
ALL( 'Split Summary' 😞 This removes all filters from the Split Summary table, ensuring that the SUM operations are performed across all rows, regardless of the current filter context.
Subtotals: With this modification, the subtotals will now calculate the percent of total deal GCI variance correctly, considering the entire dataset without the influence of row or column filters.
Best Regards
Saud Ansari
If this post helps, please Accept it as a Solution to help other members find it. I appreciate your Kudos!
Hi,
Based on the description, the DAX formula ahosakul provided should be helpful.
Please view the method, if the method helps, please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Best Regards,
Wisdom Wu
To resolve this, you can replace ALLSELECTED() with ALL(). This function removes all filters from the measure context, allowing for correct calculation of subtotals across all dimensions.
Revised Measure:
Metric % Deal GCI Variance =
DIVIDE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI] ),
CALCULATE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI] ),
ALL ( 'Split Summary' )
)
)
- DIVIDE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI (Previous Year)] ),
CALCULATE (
SUM ( 'Split Summary'[Deal GCI (Previous Year)] ),
ALL ( 'Split Summary' )
)
)
Explanation:
ALL( 'Split Summary' 😞 This removes all filters from the Split Summary table, ensuring that the SUM operations are performed across all rows, regardless of the current filter context.
Subtotals: With this modification, the subtotals will now calculate the percent of total deal GCI variance correctly, considering the entire dataset without the influence of row or column filters.
Best Regards
Saud Ansari
If this post helps, please Accept it as a Solution to help other members find it. I appreciate your Kudos!
Hi, isnt that your expected outcome? Of the deals greater than $2m...there is a variance of -5.57%... resulting from a -0.77% in Cali, -1.31% in Southeast and so on?
Doing some SUMIFs in Excel seems to validate the measure results.
The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now!
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 40 | |
| 35 | |
| 34 | |
| 31 | |
| 28 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 137 | |
| 102 | |
| 71 | |
| 67 | |
| 64 |