Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!To celebrate FabCon Vienna, we are offering 50% off select exams. Ends October 3rd. Request your discount now.
I have a table called orders for which I've created 3 vinculated measures:
My goal is to create another measure that will hold a single scalar value and will be the average of '% Penetration' for the period filtered.
Can you help me please?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @Anonymous ,
Thanks for @NaveenGandhi reply.
According to your description, you want to count the data that is not within the three states and calculate the total amount of data, and finally calculate the percentage number.
Here is my test data and steps
Create measures
Net Order Date = COUNTROWS(orders_magento)
Net Orders = CALCULATE(DISTINCTCOUNT(orders_magento[order_id]),FILTER(orders_magento, NOT orders_magento[Status] IN {"Returned(100%)", "Cancelled", "Pending"}))
% Penetration = [Net Orders]/[Net Order Date]
Final output
Best regards,
Albert He
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly
Hi,
What result do you get when you drag the % penetration measure to a card visual?
Hi @Anonymous ,
Thanks for @NaveenGandhi reply.
According to your description, you want to count the data that is not within the three states and calculate the total amount of data, and finally calculate the percentage number.
Here is my test data and steps
Create measures
Net Order Date = COUNTROWS(orders_magento)
Net Orders = CALCULATE(DISTINCTCOUNT(orders_magento[order_id]),FILTER(orders_magento, NOT orders_magento[Status] IN {"Returned(100%)", "Cancelled", "Pending"}))
% Penetration = [Net Orders]/[Net Order Date]
Final output
Best regards,
Albert He
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly
Hi @Anonymous
please share sample data and expected output( attach screenshots too) to understand the problem better.
Thanks,
NG