Supplies are limited. Contact info@espc.tech right away to save your spot before the conference sells out.
Get your discountScore big with last-minute savings on the final tickets to FabCon Vienna. Secure your discount
Hi,
In one of Udemy's example exams, there is a question about two tables - SALES and CITY DATA. They look as following:
City data
State (citydata) | city | Population (million) |
Sales
State (sales) | Type | Sales |
State in both tables contain similar values.
In the question you have to say whether a statement is correct or not. The following statement is, according to them, incorrect. However, I don't understand why, as the function RELATED is working on the one-side of relationships, that can import a column into the sales table:
Can anyone explain?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Looking at the tables:
Sales is at the state granularity.
The city table is at the city granularity so each state there has multiple cities. Eg it might look like:
State | City |
A | 1 |
A | 2 |
A | 3 |
B | 4 |
B | 5 |
B | 6 |
C | 7 |
C | 8 |
(Note City is unique but State is repeated).
You can join state to state between the tables but it will be many to many not 1 to many.
RELATED as you're aware only gets data from the 1 side of a 1 to many relationship.
Looking at the tables:
Sales is at the state granularity.
The city table is at the city granularity so each state there has multiple cities. Eg it might look like:
State | City |
A | 1 |
A | 2 |
A | 3 |
B | 4 |
B | 5 |
B | 6 |
C | 7 |
C | 8 |
(Note City is unique but State is repeated).
You can join state to state between the tables but it will be many to many not 1 to many.
RELATED as you're aware only gets data from the 1 side of a 1 to many relationship.
Thanks! I understand it now.
User | Count |
---|---|
12 | |
11 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 |
User | Count |
---|---|
25 | |
19 | |
14 | |
8 | |
7 |