Power BI is turning 10! Tune in for a special live episode on July 24 with behind-the-scenes stories, product evolution highlights, and a sneak peek at what’s in store for the future.
Save the dateEnhance your career with this limited time 50% discount on Fabric and Power BI exams. Ends August 31st. Request your voucher.
I have a use case where I need to evaluate a count based on the column filtered in a report. If the visuals are sliced using A or B, the count should evaluate to 0 else 1.
Following are more details.
I am using the DAX formula , Limit:=IF(OR(ISFILTERED(table[A]),ISFILTERED(table[B])),0,1)
There are two Roles added 1) Read 2) Restricted . Read has access to all the columns. Restricted doesn't have access to columns A and B. In that case I want the limit to be picked up as 1. But currently, the measure it self is getting restricted for the Restricted role.
Is there any way this measure works as per the expected behavior? Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks!
Personally, I think you CAN'T have a measure, which uses restricted columns, return a value for a role that does not have access to the columns/tables. But I may be incorrect as I'm not a specialist in this topic. You could try to ask Alberto Ferarri or Marco Russo. Or Chris Webb. They'll know much more on this than I do.
Thanks @daxer-almighty , is there any other way we can acheive this functionality? Without using the restricted columns in the measure directly? Like same using Row Level Security instead of column level security.
Any leads on this is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Hi @amitchandak , the role member is an azure active directory group and not individual user. Hence I can not add the user related condition in the query. I have added the role name, even then this measure is getting restricted. Could you please provide an example?
Is there a way we can verify for role membership in a measure using DAX?
User | Count |
---|---|
25 | |
11 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 |
User | Count |
---|---|
27 | |
13 | |
11 | |
9 | |
6 |