Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-700) exam on us!
Learn moreThe FabCon + SQLCon recap series starts April 14th at 8am Pacific. If you’re tracking where AI is going inside Fabric, this first session is a can't miss. Register now
I'm very new to PowerBi and am looking for some help with the RANX function. I have a table, 'Result Grades', that needs to grouped as per the table below i.e 'RecNum', 'AcYr', 'Assessment', 'A8 Order' and then ranked by the 'Result Pts' (ascending). I have tried many different ways and the closest I've come to solving the problem is with the formula :-
RankA8 =
RANKX(
FILTER(ALL(
'Result Grades'),
'Result Grades'[RecNum] = EARLIER('Result Grades'[RecNum])&&[A8Order]="1"
),
'Result Grades'[RecNum]&[AcYr]&[Assessment]&[A8Order]&[ResultPts]&[Code]
,,desc
)
The only problem with this formula is it just ranks all the grades for each 'RecNum from 1 to the highest value. Is there any way to achieve the ranking as per the column 'Rank Wanted' as below.
RecNum | AcYr | Assessment | A8Order | Code | Result Pts | RankA8 | Rank Wanted | |
8998 | 2017 | 3 | 1 | aa | 6 | 1 | 1 | |
8998 | 2017 | 3 | 1 | bb | 5 | 2 | 2 | |
8998 | 2017 | 2 | 1 | bb | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
8998 | 2017 | 2 | 1 | aa | 3 | 4 | 2 | |
8998 | 2017 | 1 | 1 | bb | 7 | 5 | 1 | |
8998 | 2017 | 1 | 1 | aa | 7 | 6 | 2 | |
10265 | 2021 | 1 | 1 | bb | 5 | 1 | 1 | |
10265 | 2021 | 1 | 1 | aa | 5 | 2 | 2 | |
10265 | 2020 | 3 | 1 | bb | 5 | 3 | 1 | |
10265 | 2020 | 3 | 1 | aa | 4 | 4 | 2 | |
10265 | 2020 | 2 | 1 | bb | 5 | 5 | 1 | |
10265 | 2020 | 2 | 1 | aa | 4 | 6 | 2 | |
10265 | 2020 | 1 | 1 | bb | 6 | 7 | 1 | |
10265 | 2020 | 1 | 1 | aa | 5 | 8 | 2 | |
10265 | 2019 | 2 | 1 | bb | 5 | 9 | 1 | |
10265 | 2019 | 2 | 1 | aa | 5 | 10 | 2 | |
10265 | 2018 | 3 | 1 | bb | 4 | 11 | 1 | |
10265 | 2018 | 2 | 1 | bb | 3 | 12 | 1 | |
10265 | 2018 | 1 | 1 | En | 3 | 13 | 1 | |
10265 | 2017 | 3 | 1 | En | 3 | 14 | 1 | |
10265 | 2017 | 2 | 1 | En | 4 | 15 | 1 | |
10265 | 2017 | 1 | 1 | En | 4 | 16 | 1 |
Solved! Go to Solution.
@UB40 , A new Rank Column
RANKX(
FILTER('Result Grades',
'Result Grades'[RecNum] = EARLIER('Result Grades'[RecNum]) && 'Result Grades'[RecNum] = earlier('Result Grades'[RecNum]) &&
'Result Grades'[AcYr] = earlier('Result Grades'[AcYr]) && 'Result Grades'[Assessment] = earlier('Result Grades'[Assessment]) &&
[A8Order]="1"
),
[ResultPts]
,,desc
)
Thank you so much for helping. 🙂
@UB40 , A new Rank Column
RANKX(
FILTER('Result Grades',
'Result Grades'[RecNum] = EARLIER('Result Grades'[RecNum]) && 'Result Grades'[RecNum] = earlier('Result Grades'[RecNum]) &&
'Result Grades'[AcYr] = earlier('Result Grades'[AcYr]) && 'Result Grades'[Assessment] = earlier('Result Grades'[Assessment]) &&
[A8Order]="1"
),
[ResultPts]
,,desc
)
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 9 | |
| 6 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 21 | |
| 14 | |
| 11 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 |