Advance your Data & AI career with 50 days of live learning, dataviz contests, hands-on challenges, study groups & certifications and more!
Get registeredGet Fabric Certified for FREE during Fabric Data Days. Don't miss your chance! Request now
Hi
I am confused with some results using an explicit filter rather than an implicit filter.
I have one fact table (ASB cases) and a Date table. The two tables have an active relationship between Calendar[Date] and ASB[Reported date].
I need a measure based on a Call Due date, where the call is made on time so am using USERELATIONSHIP.
I have got the measure working based on the following.
Clearly the way the filter is being used is wrong, but I can't really see the difference. I know Filter removes existing related filters first - so if anything was to happen I would have expected to see even more cases?
If anyone can help I'd be really grateful. I'd also welcome any advice on steps I could take to debug the issue.
Many thanks in advanve
Solved! Go to Solution.
hi @micahelw
the syntax suger is equivalent to
FILTER(ALL('ASB Case'[Contacted Reporting Party On Time?],'ASB Case'[Contacted Reporting Party On Time?] = "On-Time"))
rather
FILTER('ASB Case','ASB Case'[Contacted Reporting Party On Time?] = "On-Time"))
without the ALL, the table is always filtered by the year/row of the matrix.
hi @micahelw
the syntax suger is equivalent to
FILTER(ALL('ASB Case'[Contacted Reporting Party On Time?],'ASB Case'[Contacted Reporting Party On Time?] = "On-Time"))
rather
FILTER('ASB Case','ASB Case'[Contacted Reporting Party On Time?] = "On-Time"))
without the ALL, the table is always filtered by the year/row of the matrix.
Advance your Data & AI career with 50 days of live learning, contests, hands-on challenges, study groups & certifications and more!
Check out the October 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 25 | |
| 17 | |
| 9 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 |