March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early bird discount ends December 31.
Register NowBe one of the first to start using Fabric Databases. View on-demand sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started. Watch now
Hi,
I'd like to find a good, synthetic and functional documentation to report the all Fabric security levels following the point of data view, from the highest level to the lowest one.
A possible description could present these levels in the following hiearchical order:
1. the tenant level,
2. the domain level,
3. the subdomain level (one domain more subdomains),
4. the workspace level (one subdomains more workspaces or one domain more workspaces),
5. the item (lakehouse/warehouse/semantic model) level,
6. the object (table/view) level,
7. the row level (for lakehouse/warehouse and semantic model),
8. the column level (for lakehouse/warehouse and semantic model),
9. the other ones.
I hope I haven't made any mistakes.
It should be important to have a description related to the all security levels with the right reference to the single security data object (lakehouse/warehouse/semantic model and so on).
I've already some MS Fabric articles about the security subject but none articles that could talk in a functional, complete and synthetic manner.
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @pmscorca ,
Your ordering of the levels looks fine, though I personally think that rls, cls, and ols have the same level of security. At the moment I don't see official documentation that gives a detailed and complete comprehensive discussion of fabric security levels, perhaps they prefer to let us explore on our own.
You can submit an idea for it and wait for users with the same needs as you to vote for you to help make it happen as soon as possible.
Best Regards,
Ada Wang
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi @pmscorca ,
Your ordering of the levels looks fine, though I personally think that rls, cls, and ols have the same level of security. At the moment I don't see official documentation that gives a detailed and complete comprehensive discussion of fabric security levels, perhaps they prefer to let us explore on our own.
You can submit an idea for it and wait for users with the same needs as you to vote for you to help make it happen as soon as possible.
Best Regards,
Ada Wang
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi, thank for your reply.
I've followed your suggest and I've submitted the related idea Microsoft Idea
I think that the object level security could be a higher level respect to rls and cls, following a top-down reading.
Thanks
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions.
Arun Ulag shares exciting details about the Microsoft Fabric Conference 2025, which will be held in Las Vegas, NV.
User | Count |
---|---|
8 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 |
User | Count |
---|---|
8 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |