March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early bird discount ends December 31.
Register NowBe one of the first to start using Fabric Databases. View on-demand sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started. Watch now
Hi,
I have a external user that doesn´t have a pro license BUT ONLY when accessing external report?
When reading internal reports/app the same account/e-mail adress has a "PRO" license?
The thing that´s perculiar is if you see the users screenshot, explained below.
1. url with internal report - notice circled "Pro"
2. url with external report (my report) - notice circled "Free Account"
It´s the exact same account/email, please advice
Does anybody else have any insight into this? We are having the same problem and even though a user from an external tenancy has a Power BI Pro license, when they try to access a report on our tenancy that they have been given access to (from a Guest account associated with our tenancy), they are shown as having a trial Power BI Pro license instead of it bringing their own license from their tenancy along with them.
@v-jialongy-msft's post specifically states that:
> Assigned Pro Licenses: If the content is not in a Premium workspace, external users need to have a Pro license to access Pro content. This license can be assigned by their home organization or the sharing organization.
Is there something that needs to be done for the external user to login to the shared report with their home tenancy PRO license intact?
@Jame5_Blonde2 did you ever get an answer to this question? I can't find help anywhere.
Here are a few ways you can troubleshoot the problem.
License Assignment for External Users: When an external user is accessing content shared with them from another organization, their ability to access Pro content depends on how the sharing organization has set up licensing for external users. There are a few approaches to this:
License Status in Different Contexts: The discrepancy in license status ("Pro" vs. "Free Account") when accessing internal vs. external reports could be due to the context in which the license is evaluated. For instance, when accessing internal content, the user's Pro license from their home organization is recognized. However, when accessing external content, if the sharing organization hasn't assigned a Pro license to the guest user or doesn't have the content in a Premium workspace, the user might be seen as having a "Free Account."
Best Regards,
Jayleny
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Regarding solution number 2 (we are not on premium capacity)
Isn´t the whole point sharing cross B2B to preserve licenses between organizations not needing duplicates?
The user clearly have a PRO license and should be able to access PRO shared content!
Why should we even care to distribute in this way otherwise?
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
User | Count |
---|---|
36 | |
27 | |
19 | |
11 | |
8 |
User | Count |
---|---|
55 | |
43 | |
25 | |
13 | |
12 |