Forum Discussion
BrunoM
Advocate I
1 year agoRefresh duration of a semantic model plugged on a dataflow
Dear all, I would like to know if this situation is normal : i am working in a premium capacity. I load in a semantic model 2 tables from a dataflow Gen 1. In the semantic model, there is no tra...
- 1 year ago
BrunoM Why the Refresh Might Be Slow
Here are some key considerations:
1. Dataflow Gen 1 Performance
- Gen 1 dataflows store data in CSV format on ADLS Gen2, which is less optimized for high-speed ingestion compared to Gen 2 (which supports Lakehouse, Warehouse, etc.).
- Reading large CSVs (20M rows per table) can be I/O intensive, especially if partitioning isn't used.
2. Semantic Model Import Mode
- Even without transformations, Power BI still loads data into VertiPaq memory engine, compresses it, and builds internal structures.
- A 1.6 GB model with 40M rows total can take time to process, especially if the dataflow refresh and semantic model refresh are not well synchronized.
3. No Incremental Refresh
- If you're doing a full refresh every time, Power BI re-ingests all 40M rows, which is costly.
- Consider enabling incremental refresh if your data supports it (e.g., has a date column).
4. Network and Capacity Load
- Even in Premium, performance can vary based on concurrent workloads, network latency, and backend throttling.
- Check the refresh history for signs of bottlenecks or retry attempts.
What You Can Do
- Switch to Dataflow Gen 2: It’s more performant and integrates better with Fabric’s Lakehouse architecture.
- Enable Incremental Refresh: This can drastically reduce refresh time if your data is time-partitioned.
- Use Data Pipelines: For better control over refresh sequencing and dependencies.
- Monitor Refresh Logs: Use refresh history and CSV logs to pinpoint slow phases (e.g., data read vs. model load).
anilgavhane
Super User
1 year agoBrunoM Why the Refresh Might Be Slow
Here are some key considerations:
1. Dataflow Gen 1 Performance
- Gen 1 dataflows store data in CSV format on ADLS Gen2, which is less optimized for high-speed ingestion compared to Gen 2 (which supports Lakehouse, Warehouse, etc.).
- Reading large CSVs (20M rows per table) can be I/O intensive, especially if partitioning isn't used.
2. Semantic Model Import Mode
- Even without transformations, Power BI still loads data into VertiPaq memory engine, compresses it, and builds internal structures.
- A 1.6 GB model with 40M rows total can take time to process, especially if the dataflow refresh and semantic model refresh are not well synchronized.
3. No Incremental Refresh
- If you're doing a full refresh every time, Power BI re-ingests all 40M rows, which is costly.
- Consider enabling incremental refresh if your data supports it (e.g., has a date column).
4. Network and Capacity Load
- Even in Premium, performance can vary based on concurrent workloads, network latency, and backend throttling.
- Check the refresh history for signs of bottlenecks or retry attempts.
What You Can Do
- Switch to Dataflow Gen 2: It’s more performant and integrates better with Fabric’s Lakehouse architecture.
- Enable Incremental Refresh: This can drastically reduce refresh time if your data is time-partitioned.
- Use Data Pipelines: For better control over refresh sequencing and dependencies.
- Monitor Refresh Logs: Use refresh history and CSV logs to pinpoint slow phases (e.g., data read vs. model load).
BrunoM
Advocate I
1 year agoThank you anilgavhane
I will try with a dataflow Gen 2 and also Pipeline (i do not know anything on this techno)