Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!Get Fabric Certified for FREE during Fabric Data Days. Don't miss your chance! Request now
I know in some cases you have to expand the columns when doing a left outer join/merge but when doing a left anti join/merge I don't think expanding is required. Is this the best practice to follow? As when I did a left anti join i delete the table column instead of expanding it and the number of rows returned were as I expected.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Of coz the deletion of the merged column does the trick since there is nothing but nulls in the merged column from a left anti-join.
| Thanks to the great efforts by MS engineers to simplify syntax of DAX! Most beginners are SUCCESSFULLY MISLED to think that they could easily master DAX; but it turns out that the intricacy of the most frequently used RANKX() is still way beyond their comprehension! |
DAX is simple, but NOT EASY! |
Of coz the deletion of the merged column does the trick since there is nothing but nulls in the merged column from a left anti-join.
| Thanks to the great efforts by MS engineers to simplify syntax of DAX! Most beginners are SUCCESSFULLY MISLED to think that they could easily master DAX; but it turns out that the intricacy of the most frequently used RANKX() is still way beyond their comprehension! |
DAX is simple, but NOT EASY! |
Check out the November 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Advance your Data & AI career with 50 days of live learning, contests, hands-on challenges, study groups & certifications and more!
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 9 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 22 | |
| 14 | |
| 11 | |
| 10 | |
| 9 |