Forum Discussion

Anonymous's avatar
Anonymous
Not applicable
4 years ago
Solved

Limit Dimension Data based on Fact Table in Power Query

There are 2 tables:

1. Dimension Table D - EMPNO (25,000,000 rows) sourced from Oracle DB

2. Fact Table F - Excel source

join on D.EMPNO=F.EMPNO using Merge queries in Power Query.

 

The performance is extremely slow using Import/DirectQuery mode. I tried to limit the rows in Dimension table by following the below steps:

1. Buffered List to extract unique list of EMPNO in F - EmpList 

Emplist = let
Source = List.Distinct(F[EMPNO]),
#"Buffered List" = List.Buffer(Source)
in
#"Buffered List"

2. Filter Dimension D  i.e. Table.SelectRows(#"Changed Type",each List.Contains(EmpList, [EMPNO]))

 

It works but it is extremely slow when "Enable Load" is enabled for Dimension D. Although the Step (2) returns few rows(129 rows), when I apply the changes in Power Query, it loads all the rows for Dimension D.

 

I was hoping to get some guidance if there is anything wrong or can be done differently.

 

 

Need Help
  • BA_Pete's avatar
    BA_Pete
    4 years ago

     

    Ok. Your current query setup won't allow query folding.

    Can you try connecting without using an explicit SQL statement please?

     

    Connect to the DB again, and leave the SQL statement blank:

     

    Just hit OK, then select your dim_employee table from the table list and import.

     

    Assuming this goes as planned, select the [EMPNO] column in your new dimension table and filter just one value. This should be fast to implement and sets us up a new step with the correct structure.

    Edit that new step in the formula bar, so it uses our streaming list filter, something like this:

    = Table.SelectRows(
    previousStepName,
    each List.Contains( List.Buffer( factTableName[EMPNO] ), [EMPNO] )
)

     

    This setup should allow PQ to stream the [EMPNO] values from your Excel source into the SQL native query sent to the SQL source for your dim_employee table.

     

    Pete 

  • BA_Pete's avatar
    BA_Pete
    4 years ago

    Hi Anonymous ,

     

    If you right-click your #"Filtered Rows" step, is 'Native Query' now selectable, or is it still greyed-out?

    If it's still greyed out, try changing one of the column data types to the same type, but not a text column. For example, change a date type column to date type, or a decimal type column to decimal. This is purely to force PQ to re-evaluate the query and hopefully force it to generate a native query to source.

    If native query IS selectable, then you're probably at the limit of optimisation. The Oracle Data Access Client (ODAC) requirement isn't the best in this regard.

     

    Pete

     

    Pete

22 Replies

  • james_m's avatar
    james_m
    Frequent Visitor
    2 years ago

    I had the same issue. The solutions below didn't work for me, but this one did. It took me hours to get it to work. I'm unsure why the other solutions didn't work and this one did, as it looks very similar to the other solutions.

     

     

    = let 
DistinctKey = List.Buffer( List.Distinct(FctTable[DimKey])),
DimFiltered = Table.SelectRows(dbo_DimTable, each List.Contains(DistinctKey, [DimKey]))
in DimFiltered

     

     

    It's really important that you can see "View Native Query" in the screenshot below, otherwise it will be doing the processing in PowerBI rather than doing the query on the server side. The query will work much faster if the query is running on the server. Power BI will attempt to put the list into an "IN" statement in SQL Server; this works fine if you have less than 1000 rows you want to filter; if you want to filter many more rows than this, you might run into some issues. Say if you have 500,000 rows in your dimension, but you only need 200 rows, this method would work, but if you want to filter to 100,000 rows, this method will not work well.

     

     

    • Anonymous's avatar
      Anonymous
      Not applicable
      2 years ago

      This worked well for my situation. Thank you

  • BA_Pete's avatar
    BA_Pete
    Super User
    4 years ago

    Hi Anonymous ,

     

    The first thing you can try is to shortcut your buffered list filter:

    Remove your 'Buffered List' query then change the filter step in your dimension table to something like this:

    Table.SelectRows(
    #"Changed Type",
    each List.Contains(List.Buffer(List.Distinct(F[EMPNO])), [EMPNO])
)

     

    To be honest, I can't imagine this will speed things a up a whole lot, but worth a try.

     

    The next thing you can do is to delete the merge and just send both tables to the data model. Relate them on D[EMPNO] = F[EMPNO]. It's likely to be significantly quicker than doing an unfolded Power Query merge.

     

    Pete

    • Anonymous's avatar
      Anonymous
      Not applicable
      4 years ago

      Hi BA_Pete 

      Thanks for your response.

      I have tried it but doesn't make much difference:

      Table.SelectRows(
    #"Changed Type",
    each List.Contains(List.Buffer(List.Distinct(F[EMPNO])), [EMPNO])
)

       As the fact data is excel file based, I cannot join them in the database at the moment.

      As a workaround, I have used DirectQuery mode however, the report is slow.

      Any other ideas please?

      • BA_Pete's avatar
        BA_Pete
        Super User
        4 years ago

        Hi Anonymous ,

         

        Did you try removing the merge and relating in the data model?

        I think the fastest setup you'll get to in this scenario would be to use the buffered list filter on the dimension table in PQ, then relate both in the model.

        You could also try filtering your dimension table in other ways in PQ before loading. To have 25M employee numbers in a dimension table I have to assume it goes back many years. Is it feasible to filter to maybe only employees active in the last few years? Maybe filter it for certain departments and create separate reports for each department?

        This PQ filter will also be included in visual queries sent to the source when using Direct Query.

         

        Pete

    • Anonymous's avatar
      Anonymous
      Not applicable
      4 years ago

      hi edhans 

      My Fact Table is excel based source and Dimension is Oracle table.

      May be it works fine for Relational data sources but it is extremely slow. Can you share a sample file where you have implemented the above , just in case I am missing anything?

      • edhans's avatar
        edhans
        Community Champion
        4 years ago

        I cannot provide a sample file because it was connected to my instance of SQL Server. If you install SQL Server and the Contoso or AdventureWorks sample databases, you can test the code in my blog post I linked to.

         

        On the Oracle issue, I have seen VERY SLOW query performance with Power BI and Oracle, even when it folds, and I 100% blame the horrible Oracle driver Power BI uses. Clearly Power BI can do this as it works great with SQL and Snowflake databases, and clearly Oracle is a good RDB, but Power BI+Oracle is a substandard mix.

        So much so I have a client that used to use Oracle as their datawarehouse and are now moving everything to SnowFlake because it offers superior performance with Power BI.