Forum Discussion
Calculate Equipment State Duration per Shift
- Anonymous6 years ago
here a solution "complete" (corresponding to the status of the information received 😁) avoiding the use of the function List.Accumulate.
starting table:
output Table:
the code for the output table:
let ct = Table.TransformColumnTypes(Table,{{"StateDateTime", type datetime}, {"EquipmentState", type text}, {"ShiftIndex", Int64.Type}}), idx=List.RemoveLastN(List.Distinct(ct[ShiftIndex]),1), lstR=List.Generate( ()=>[r=1,pos=List.PositionOf(ct[ShiftIndex],idx{0},Occurrence.Last), lr=sfht(ct{pos},ct{pos+1})], each [r]<=List.Count(idx), each [r=[r]+1, pos=List.PositionOf(ct[ShiftIndex],idx{[r]},Occurrence.Last),lr=sfht(ct{pos},ct{pos+1}) ], each [lr] ), tc= Table.Combine({Table.FromRecords(List.Combine(lstR)),Table}), grp = Table.Group(tc, {"ShiftIndex"}, {{"shIdx", each duration(_)}}), #"Expanded shIdx" = Table.ExpandTableColumn(grp, "shIdx", {"StateDateTime", "EquipmentState", "Duration"}, {"StateDateTime", "EquipmentState", "Duration"}) in #"Expanded shIdx"the two functions used:
sfht
let listRows=(rL,rF)=> let shift=#duration(0,0,720,0), dL=rL[StateDateTime], dF=rF[StateDateTime], lr=List.Generate( ()=>[r=rL&[StateDateTime=#datetime(Date.Year(dL),Date.Month(dL),Date.Day(dL)+sh{1},sh{0},0,0)],idx=1], each [r][StateDateTime]<=dF, each [r=if Number.Mod(idx,2)=1 then [r]& [StateDateTime=[r][StateDateTime]+shift] else [r]&[ShiftIndex=[r][ShiftIndex]+1],idx=[idx]+1], each [r] ), sh=if Time.Hour(dL) < 6 then {6,0} else if Time.Hour(dL)<18 then {18,0} else {6,1} in lr in listRowsand finally duration:
let count=(tab)=> let ts=Table.Sort(tab,{"StateDateTime"}), ai = Table.AddIndexColumn(ts, "i", 0, 1) in Table.RemoveColumns(Table.AddColumn(ai, "Duration", each try if [ShiftIndex]=ai[ShiftIndex]{[i]+1} then Duration.TotalMinutes(ai[StateDateTime]{[i]+1}-[StateDateTime]) else "" otherwise""),{"i"}) in count
Hi mahoneypat - Thanks for your insights as well... I found a solution to the problem, but does take a while to run, where the solution you gave seem to have given better performance - the only issue still outstanding on your solution was to accomodate for Equipment states that do not change for more that 1 shift (ie. we do not log any EquipmentState for more than 12 hours...) - would have loved to see the solution, if this above mentioned problem could have also been address by your method.
To incorporate that would require going with a different approach in M, but I probably would approach that with DAX instead. Since you have a solution, I won't spend time on that.
Regards,
Pat