Forum Discussion
Calculate Equipment State Duration per Shift
- Anonymous6 years ago
here a solution "complete" (corresponding to the status of the information received 😁) avoiding the use of the function List.Accumulate.
starting table:
output Table:
the code for the output table:
let ct = Table.TransformColumnTypes(Table,{{"StateDateTime", type datetime}, {"EquipmentState", type text}, {"ShiftIndex", Int64.Type}}), idx=List.RemoveLastN(List.Distinct(ct[ShiftIndex]),1), lstR=List.Generate( ()=>[r=1,pos=List.PositionOf(ct[ShiftIndex],idx{0},Occurrence.Last), lr=sfht(ct{pos},ct{pos+1})], each [r]<=List.Count(idx), each [r=[r]+1, pos=List.PositionOf(ct[ShiftIndex],idx{[r]},Occurrence.Last),lr=sfht(ct{pos},ct{pos+1}) ], each [lr] ), tc= Table.Combine({Table.FromRecords(List.Combine(lstR)),Table}), grp = Table.Group(tc, {"ShiftIndex"}, {{"shIdx", each duration(_)}}), #"Expanded shIdx" = Table.ExpandTableColumn(grp, "shIdx", {"StateDateTime", "EquipmentState", "Duration"}, {"StateDateTime", "EquipmentState", "Duration"}) in #"Expanded shIdx"the two functions used:
sfht
let listRows=(rL,rF)=> let shift=#duration(0,0,720,0), dL=rL[StateDateTime], dF=rF[StateDateTime], lr=List.Generate( ()=>[r=rL&[StateDateTime=#datetime(Date.Year(dL),Date.Month(dL),Date.Day(dL)+sh{1},sh{0},0,0)],idx=1], each [r][StateDateTime]<=dF, each [r=if Number.Mod(idx,2)=1 then [r]& [StateDateTime=[r][StateDateTime]+shift] else [r]&[ShiftIndex=[r][ShiftIndex]+1],idx=[idx]+1], each [r] ), sh=if Time.Hour(dL) < 6 then {6,0} else if Time.Hour(dL)<18 then {18,0} else {6,1} in lr in listRowsand finally duration:
let count=(tab)=> let ts=Table.Sort(tab,{"StateDateTime"}), ai = Table.AddIndexColumn(ts, "i", 0, 1) in Table.RemoveColumns(Table.AddColumn(ai, "Duration", each try if [ShiftIndex]=ai[ShiftIndex]{[i]+1} then Duration.TotalMinutes(ai[StateDateTime]{[i]+1}-[StateDateTime]) else "" otherwise""),{"i"}) in count
Thank you mahoneypat - this does help a lot! Thanks for the inputs
The one last thing we need to look at in this scenario is the ShiftIndex that we just FilledDown.
The ShiftIndex is a number that indicates what shift we are referencing. Hence in your code the Fill down gives us this output:
StateDateTimeEquipmentStateShiftIndex
| 2020/08/22 05:50:00 | Startup | 1 |
| 2020/08/22 05:59:00 | Startup | 1 |
| 2020/08/22 06:00:00 | Startup | 1 |
| 2020/08/22 06:10:00 | Running | 2 |
| 2020/08/22 12:30:00 | Maintenance | 2 |
| 2020/08/22 14:30:00 | Failure | 2 |
| 2020/08/22 17:59:00 | Failure | 2 |
| 2020/08/22 18:00:00 | Failure | 2 |
| 2020/08/22 18:30:00 | Running | 3 |
| 2020/08/22 18:45:00 | ShutDown | 3 |
| 2020/08/23 05:59:00 | ShutDown | 3 |
| 2020/08/23 06:00:00 | Startup | 4 |
| 2020/08/23 06:00:00 | Startup | 4 |
| 2020/08/23 06:20:00 | Running | 4 |
| 2020/08/23 17:59:00 | Running | 4 |
| 2020/08/23 18:00:00 | Running | 4 |
| 2020/08/23 19:00:00 | ShutDown | 5 |
Which is correct for all fields and exactly what we need, however the ShiftIndex now becomes a challenge.
Where we would need to increment the ShiftIndex, when we have an entry in the next Shift, like this:
(I've added a comment filed to help explain)
StateDateTimeEquipmentStateShiftIndex Comment
| 2020/08/22 05:50:00 | Startup | 1 | |
| 2020/08/22 05:59:00 | Startup | 1 | |
| 2020/08/22 06:00:00 | Startup | 2 | from 06:00 is the next Shift, so ShiftIndex needs to reflect the next ShiftIndex |
| 2020/08/22 06:10:00 | Running | 2 | |
| 2020/08/22 12:30:00 | Maintenance | 2 | |
| 2020/08/22 14:30:00 | Failure | 2 | |
| 2020/08/22 17:59:00 | Failure | 2 | |
| 2020/08/22 18:00:00 | Failure | 3 | from 18:00 is the next Shift, so ShiftIndex needs to reflect the next ShiftIndex |
| 2020/08/22 18:30:00 | Running | 3 | |
| 2020/08/22 18:45:00 | ShutDown | 3 | |
| 2020/08/23 05:59:00 | ShutDown | 3 | |
| 2020/08/23 06:00:00 | Startup | 4 | Correct ShiftIndex, as the State change was logged at 06:00 |
| 2020/08/23 06:00:00 | Startup | 4 | |
| 2020/08/23 06:20:00 | Running | 4 | |
| 2020/08/23 17:59:00 | Running | 4 | |
| 2020/08/23 18:00:00 | Running | 4 | from 18:00 is the next Shift, so ShiftIndex needs to reflect the next ShiftIndex |
| 2020/08/23 19:00:00 | ShutDown | 5 |
We will also run into an issue with the ShiftIndex, if we have an EquipmentState that has a duration across multiple shifts. So if we use this input dataset for example:
StateDateTimeEquipmentStateShiftIndex
| 2020/08/24 05:50:00 | Running | 5 |
| 2020/08/25 06:15:00 | ShutDown | 8 |
Your Solution gives us this output because of the FillDown on ShiftIndex:
StateDateTimeEquipmentStateShiftIndex
| 2020/08/24 05:50:00 | Running | 5 |
| 2020/08/24 05:59:00 | Running | 5 |
| 2020/08/24 06:00:00 | Running | 5 |
| 2020/08/24 17:59:00 | Running | 5 |
| 2020/08/24 18:00:00 | Running | 5 |
| 2020/08/25 05:59:00 | Running | 5 |
| 2020/08/25 06:00:00 | Running | 5 |
| 2020/08/25 06:15:00 | ShutDown | 8 |
| 2020/08/25 17:59:00 | ShutDown | 8 |
| 2020/08/25 18:00:00 | ShutDown | 8 |
Where we need the following in terms of ShiftIndex:
StateDateTimeEquipmentStateShiftIndex
| 2020/08/24 05:50:00 | Running | 5 |
| 2020/08/24 05:59:00 | Running | 5 |
| 2020/08/24 06:00:00 | Running | 6 |
| 2020/08/24 17:59:00 | Running | 6 |
| 2020/08/24 18:00:00 | Running | 7 |
| 2020/08/25 05:59:00 | Running | 7 |
| 2020/08/25 06:00:00 | Running | 8 |
| 2020/08/25 06:15:00 | ShutDown | 8 |
| 2020/08/25 17:59:00 | ShutDown | 8 |
| 2020/08/25 18:00:00 | ShutDown | 8 |
Thanks again for the time and help on this!
The M code has been updated to add a ShiftIndexIncrement to address your first point. I will re-read and try to address the second point later (time to "go" to work).
let
Source = Table.FromRows(Json.Document(Binary.Decompress(Binary.FromText("bc9ND4IwDAbgv2J2JmErzCBnNPHgRbwtHBadugQqki768x1gRD4OS5r1Sd9WKZaTJpP5d7KVYQHbPp2tK4PUNfxHfrdX2uPFvFkRKJaEACFw4CsuU8lbQLohV/tKTMU6Fa04OkSLN1/BRAhIo1YctEUyqPFsllTcq522pWsWRdKLISmai1h25zjKHi/8J9FvXT4+KJ4LGMdMhdh8ZwwxkhXFBw==", BinaryEncoding.Base64), Compression.Deflate)), let _t = ((type nullable text) meta [Serialized.Text = true]) in type table [StateDateTime = _t, EquipmentState = _t, ShiftIndex = _t]),
#"Promoted Headers" = Table.PromoteHeaders(Source, [PromoteAllScalars=true]),
#"Changed Type1" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Promoted Headers",{{"StateDateTime", type datetime}}),
#"Removed Other Columns" = Table.SelectColumns(#"Changed Type1",{"StateDateTime"}),
#"Changed Type2" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Removed Other Columns",{{"StateDateTime", type date}}),
#"Removed Duplicates" = Table.Distinct(#"Changed Type2"),
#"Added Custom" = Table.AddColumn(#"Removed Duplicates", "ShiftList", each {#time(5,59,59), #time(6,0,0), #time(17,59,59), #time(18,0,0)}),
#"Expanded ShiftList" = Table.ExpandListColumn(#"Added Custom", "ShiftList"),
#"Merged Columns" = Table.CombineColumns(Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Expanded ShiftList", {{"StateDateTime", type text}, {"ShiftList", type text}}, "en-US"),{"StateDateTime", "ShiftList"},Combiner.CombineTextByDelimiter(" ", QuoteStyle.None),"StateDateTime.1"),
#"Changed Type" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Merged Columns",{{"StateDateTime.1", type datetime}}),
#"Renamed Columns" = Table.RenameColumns(#"Changed Type",{{"StateDateTime.1", "StateDateTime"}}),
#"Added Custom1" = Table.AddColumn(#"Renamed Columns", "ShiftIndexIncrement", each if Time.Hour([StateDateTime]) = 6 or Time.Hour([StateDateTime]) =18 then 1 else 0, Int64.Type),
#"Appended Query" = Table.Combine({#"Added Custom1", #"Changed Type1"}),
#"Sorted Rows" = Table.Sort(#"Appended Query",{{"StateDateTime", Order.Ascending}}),
#"Filled Down" = Table.FillDown(#"Sorted Rows",{"EquipmentState", "ShiftIndex"}),
#"Replaced Value" = Table.ReplaceValue(#"Filled Down",null,0,Replacer.ReplaceValue,{"ShiftIndexIncrement"}),
#"Changed Type3" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Replaced Value",{{"ShiftIndex", Int64.Type}}),
#"Added Custom2" = Table.AddColumn(#"Changed Type3", "NewShiftIndex", each [ShiftIndex]+[ShiftIndexIncrement]),
#"Removed Columns" = Table.RemoveColumns(#"Added Custom2",{"ShiftIndexIncrement", "ShiftIndex"}),
#"Changed Type4" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Removed Columns",{{"NewShiftIndex", type text}})
in
#"Changed Type4"
If this works for you, please mark it as the solution. Kudos are appreciated too. Please let me know if not.
Regards,
Pat
- EricSteynMMD6 years agoFrequent Visitor
Hi mahoneypat - Thanks for your insights as well... I found a solution to the problem, but does take a while to run, where the solution you gave seem to have given better performance - the only issue still outstanding on your solution was to accomodate for Equipment states that do not change for more that 1 shift (ie. we do not log any EquipmentState for more than 12 hours...) - would have loved to see the solution, if this above mentioned problem could have also been address by your method.
- mahoneypat6 years agoMicrosoft Employee
To incorporate that would require going with a different approach in M, but I probably would approach that with DAX instead. Since you have a solution, I won't spend time on that.
Regards,
Pat