Starting December 3, join live sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started
Learn moreShape the future of the Fabric Community! Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions. Take survey.
I have 2 solutions to remove repeating headers from this combined data table
Ee ID | Ee Name | Ee Status |
101 | ABC | aa |
102 | DEF | bb |
Ee ID | Ee Name | Ee Status |
103 | dghs | aa |
104 | sfgh | bb |
Ee ID | Ee Name | Ee Status |
105 | AgfBC | aa |
106 | DgtEF | bb |
Option 1: To promote 1st row as headers and use Does Not Contain Filter after
Option 2: Remove Duplicate Row from entire table
This option works too because no 2 rows are duplicate in the dataset except the repeating headers
Please suggest
1) Which one is more efficient- I have 30 tables with 6000 rows each to append
2) If there is a technique in combining multiple files from SharePoint folder that can avoid bringing duplicate headers
Solved! Go to Solution.
@GulianiG Well, I would generally say whichever one supports query folding. However, if it is a SharePoint Folder, I do not believe that supports query folding. For the sake of future proofing, I would probably go with Option 1 as it seems like it would be less seceptible to future problems. Also, if query folding were in play, a simple filter would almost certainly fold.
@foodd AND @Greg_Deckler Thank you both
We will be moving sources to SQL soon, so query folding via filter advised would help
@GulianiG Well, I would generally say whichever one supports query folding. However, if it is a SharePoint Folder, I do not believe that supports query folding. For the sake of future proofing, I would probably go with Option 1 as it seems like it would be less seceptible to future problems. Also, if query folding were in play, a simple filter would almost certainly fold.
Yes, fully agree, Option 1, and perserve folding with a filter.
User | Count |
---|---|
25 | |
13 | |
12 | |
11 | |
8 |
User | Count |
---|---|
44 | |
27 | |
19 | |
16 | |
12 |