Join us for an expert-led overview of the tools and concepts you'll need to pass exam PL-300. The first session starts on June 11th. See you there!
Get registeredJoin us at FabCon Vienna from September 15-18, 2025, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community-led learning event. Save €200 with code FABCOMM. Get registered
Hi,
I've two warehouses, the first one in the workspace named ws1 and the second one in the workspace named ws2.
In a such scenario, how could I create a shortcut in the warehouse of ws2 to point to the warehouse of ws1 as an internal source?
Moreover, it seems that for a shortcut it is possible to point only to a warehouse table and not also to a view; the views are not visible.
Any helps to me, please? Thanks
It seems that Fabric doesn't manage very well the lakehouse/warehouse views and this is a serious lack!
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @pmscorca if you're talking about the Warehouse (and not lakehouse) then currently you can't create a shortcut from a Warehouse. You can only create shortcuts in Lakehouses (to other Lakehouses and Warehouses).
Keep an eye on the roadmap for any features What's new and planned for OneLake in Microsoft Fabric - Microsoft Fabric | Microsoft Learn
Add an Idea to the ideas site for anything you believe is lacking in features/functionality: Home (microsoft.com)
------------------------------------------------------------
If my reply has been useful please consider providing
kudos (thumbs up).
If my reply has answered your question please consider
marking it as the solution to close the thread
----------------------------------------------------------------
If you have a table in Warehouse A in WS1.
You want to shortcut this table into Warehouse B in WS2 (no-copy approach).
I think you will first need to create a Lakehouse in WS2. In this Lakehouse, create a shortcut to bring the table from the Warehouse A in WS1 into the Lakehouse in WS2. Then, in the Warehouse B in WS2, use a cross-database query to use the Lakehouse table in Warehouse B.
I think this is the current approach to solve that need.
Hi, many thanks for your reply and suggest, but it is a workaround and not a direct solution. Thanks
Hi @pmscorca if you're talking about the Warehouse (and not lakehouse) then currently you can't create a shortcut from a Warehouse. You can only create shortcuts in Lakehouses (to other Lakehouses and Warehouses).
Keep an eye on the roadmap for any features What's new and planned for OneLake in Microsoft Fabric - Microsoft Fabric | Microsoft Learn
Add an Idea to the ideas site for anything you believe is lacking in features/functionality: Home (microsoft.com)
------------------------------------------------------------
If my reply has been useful please consider providing
kudos (thumbs up).
If my reply has answered your question please consider
marking it as the solution to close the thread
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi, thanks for your reply?
If it is possible to create a shortcut in a lakehouse, I don't understand because it isn't possible to create a shortcut in a warehouse: perhaps for an architectural reason?
About the view object as a feature/functionality there are some related issues: a lakehouse view isn't usable in a data pipeline, a warehouse view isn't visible for a shortcut in a lakehouse to point a warehouse, a warehouse view isn't usable in a PBI semantic model/report; why does a view seem an incomplete feature? For an architectural reason? Does a view on delta format cause some issues?
In general, whatever feature should follow a logic, a functional strategy, a vision, should be complete and not fragmented. An idea should be related to a new feature to propose and not to a missing segment about a functionality. Why is it possible to create a lakehouse view and is not possible to use it in a data pipeline? Is it better to have an incomplete feature or a complete feature? At least I think that it is very important to know the reasons because a feature is incomplete. We interface with the customers: what do we tell them in such cases?
User | Count |
---|---|
79 | |
43 | |
15 | |
11 | |
7 |
User | Count |
---|---|
90 | |
87 | |
26 | |
8 | |
7 |