The official mobile app downloaded from the App Store or Play Store includes a dedicated filter section in the smartphone layout. On tablets, however, the standard filter pane is shown, similar to the web view on a desktop. For a better user experience, it would be great to have a dedicated filter section on tablets as well - one that is more comfortable to use with touch and provides a wider area.   Thanks ... View more

Description: The built‑in Microsoft Gantt visual currently does not display a roll‑up bar at the parent task level when child tasks exist. As a result, parent tasks show hierarchy but do not visually represent the aggregated duration of their children. This makes it difficult to use the visual for high‑level project or work package reporting, especially in environments using AWP/WFP, portfolio summaries, or executive dashboards. Problem: When a task is structured as a parent and contains one or more sub‑tasks, the parent row collapses visually but the duration bar is missing, so there is no high‑level timeline representation. Users often need to communicate summary timelines without expanding all children. Impact: Prevents proper roll‑up of engineering, construction, or schedule data. Makes the visual ineffective for senior‑level reporting. Complicates dashboards for project controls and AWP workflows where parent‑level summaries are required. Requested Enhancement: Please add a “Show Parent Roll‑Up Bar” option to the Microsoft Gantt visual that: Calculates the parent bar using the earliest start and latest finish of all its children. Renders a summary bar (e.g., lighter color, dashed, bolded, or customizable). Works whether the parent row is expanded or collapsed. Supports conditional formatting and tooltips like normal task bars. Why this is needed: Roll‑ups are standard in planning tools (e.g., Primavera, MS Project) and are essential for summarizing phases, deliverables, or work packages. Power BI’s native Gantt visual would become far more usable for enterprise project reporting if parent‑level timeline roll‑ups were visible. ... View more

Description: This request refers specifically to the “Gantt (Microsoft)” visual from AppSource, not a built‑in Power BI visual. Power BI does not include a native Gantt chart; therefore, all Gantt functionality relies on this AppSource visual users import from the marketplace. [learn.microsoft.com] The current Microsoft Gantt visual supports a simple hierarchy, but only one parent level. If a dataset contains multiple hierarchical layers (e.g., Program → Project → WBS → Activity), the visual does not properly handle or display multiple parent layers. Problem: For many real-world project frameworks (AWP, CPM, WBS, Portfolio Management), tasks have more than one parent level. The current Gantt visual either: flattens additional layers or ignores them entirely or displays them without proper indentation or hierarchy behavior This prevents accurate multi‑level project reporting. Impact: Users cannot visualize common industry structures (e.g., Level 1 → Level 2 → Level 3 → Level 4) Executive dashboards cannot roll up multi‑tier program data WBS structures, construction packages, engineering disciplines, and portfolio trees cannot be modeled correctly Forces organizations to use 3rd‑party paid visuals Requested Enhancement: Please add support for unlimited or at least multi‑level parent hierarchy within the Microsoft Gantt visual, including: Proper indentation for multiple parent levels Expand/collapse controls per level Correct timeline aggregation at each parent layer Visual formatting by level Tooltip inheritance through hierarchy This enhancement is essential for real‑world project and portfolio management scenarios. ... View more

There is not a way to show a marker/line plot of all data in Power BI with provided visuals. A line chart aggregates the data, thus if there is sequential repeating values does not display this data. A scatter plot provides all markers, but does not have an option to include a line to connect the markers. This is a huge barrier to creating basic plots. ... View more

It would be nice if MS could give the ability to developer to set the default font size for name of reports and to set the navigation pane width. Currently, if the report name is long, it doesn't show when a user opens the report which is diminishing user experience. We'd like to set the navigation pane width (& height) by ourselves. Also, the font size should be customizable.  Changing zoom on browser affects all web pages being visited using that browser, which is not what we want.  Just like inside the report, font should be formattable even for report names. ... View more

Please allow suppressing “Download Power BI Desktop” pop‑up in Power BI Report Server. ... View more

In Power BI Service, when exporting a report to PowerPoint, the “Export as image” option allows exporting either the current page or the entire report. However, when selecting “Embed live data”, the export is limited to only the current page. There is no option to export the full report (multiple pages) with live data embedded. This creates a limitation for business presentations where users want: • All report pages included in a single PowerPoint file • Each slide to retain live interactivity • Consistent behavior between “Export as image” and “Embed live data” Suggested improvement: • Add an option in “Embed live data” to export the entire report (all pages), similar to the existing behavior for image export. This would significantly improve usability for stakeholders who rely on live, interactive PowerPoint presentations. ... View more

I would like to submit a feature request regarding language and regional settings in Power BI Service. Many users prefer to keep the interface language in English, as it is the standard language used in documentation, collaboration, and technical communication. However, the current setup primarily links English to the US regional format, which creates challenges for users in Europe and other regions that follow different standards. Specifically, many organisations would benefit from the possibility to select English (UK) — or a similar international English option — where: Dates follow the European format (dd.mm.yyyy) instead of the US format (mm/dd/yyyy) Number formatting uses spaces as thousand separators and commas as decimal separators, according to European conventions The interface language remains English while regional formatting follows local standards Today, users often need to compromise between interface language and correct regional formatting, which can lead to confusion, interpretation errors, and reduced usability in reports shared across international teams. Adding support for English (UK) or allowing independent control over interface language and regional formatting would significantly improve the user experience for many Power BI customers in Europe and other non-US regions. ... View more

add comments like in word to give more context or specific notes which should be taken into account. and that are not important for the general overview of the dashboard.  ... View more

Centralized Purview configuration has setup sensitivity labels. Some of the labels have email controls, e.g. "Internal" labeled emails can only be sent to the company mail domain recipients, while "External" labeled emails can be sent to recipients that does not have company domain email. This is in effect and is working when sending email through Outlook clients. The Purview configuration for the sensitivity labels have been enabled for Fabric. Users can set the sensitivity labels on objects in Fabric. Before I continue, please note that there is a Fabric tenant setting for "Users can send email subscriptions to external users" - we are using this setting today for specific user groups.   When creating a Power BI subscription, regardless of if it's a Power BI report or for a Power BI Paginated report, there is the information that "The sensitivity label on this report/paginated report does not appear in emails." Also note that Power BI subscriptions are not using the company tenant mail service to send subscriptions, subscriptions are sent from a Microsoft owned mail service.   Correct sensitivity labels are set on attached report output (in our case, when attaching the output as either PowerPoint, Excel, Word. No sensitivity labels are set on the actual email, which is documented. The controls set through the company tenants Purview on sensitivity labels, such as who to send to is not adhered.   The issue and the idea is that unless you can implement that your (Microsoft) mail service that is used by to send the subscriptions can recieve and follow the controls by the company tenant Purview configuration - which would be the ideal setup since Purview should be able to work in Azure, in all components - then as a second idea would be to allow us to use our own mail services which know of and follow the controls, for Power BI subscriptions, which does not seem to be possible today. ... View more

Users are looking for a date when direct query and mixed mode reports will have updates similar to import. Any update on this feature would be helpful. ... View more

Need a direct option to restore deleted report in the workspace ... View more

 For machine-based public IP access—such as from service principals or managed identities—we need more flexible control, for example by temporarily relaxing or disabling the workspace firewall. ... View more

Hi team, Currently, the only reliable way to understand Capacity Unit (CU) usage for Microsoft Fabric items—such as Notebooks and Data Pipelines—is to wait for the data to appear in the Fabric Capacity Metrics App. However: Item‑level CU data often appears with significant delay This makes it difficult to immediately evaluate the impact of code or logic changes There is no real‑time or near‑real‑time CU usage visibility per run For performance tuning and cost optimization, it would be extremely valuable to have instant or near‑instant CU consumption metrics for each completed run of a Notebook or Data Pipeline. What I’m looking for: A way to see CU consumed per run immediately after the job completes Ideally available through: The pipeline/notebook run history UI A REST API endpoint A system table or log stream This would allow fast iteration to see whether a code or configuration change increased or reduced CU consumption Why this matters: Helps teams optimize workloads quickly Reduces capacity waste Avoids waiting hours for metrics to update Enables immediate validation during development and tuning Thanks in advance, Adarsh ... View more

Would we be able to include a sales rep cut on the POD Falloff tool in Hero Analytics? ... View more

Customers have recently observed a change in the semantic model UI in Power BI Service. However, no prior notification was found in the Microsoft documentation or the Power BI blog. Please notify beforehand in any of above channels if there is any small UI change ... View more

We created an Excel file connected to Salesforce using Power Query and stored it in SharePoint Online. Our intention was to refresh the Excel data connections using an Office Script + Power Automate flow. Issue: Due to limitations in Excel Online, Office Scripts cannot refresh Power Query connections, which prevents us from auto-refreshing Salesforce data inside SharePoint Excel. This is a confirmed Microsoft limitation. Suggestion: Build a feature enabling Power Query refresh in Excel Online using Automation. ... View more

Currently ms fabric tries to create warehouses and lakehouses with validation on views.  In most cases if view reference items that not exist yet ( example openrowset to files that not yet exist , view ref between 2 warehouses , ... )  Then the whole sync fails. Leaving you in the mid of a sync with no option to at least have infrastructure and all other artificacts available and synced in the workspace.    Some messy intervention is needed to reconstruct.  This makes option as 'checkout to workspace' in many cases impossible.    I believe if auto validation would not be done. Running the pipelines after sync would solve the disconnect And make it possible to solve most of the disconnect in the workspace manually. Making it workable   It would also make azure devops pipelines for automation much easier  ... View more

Allow us to create our own key:value tags for workspaces.   Additionally, support two independent tagging systems: Organization-level tags (admin-governed) Personal tags (user-defined, private) This would enable powerful filtering and significantly improve workspace navigation for users with many projects and deployment stages.   This would enable us to do things like:   Show only feature workspaces Show only workspaces in project_b Show only test workspaces for project_c Combine filters like environment = feature AND project = project_b   ... View more