Validation requirement Test 2.5 (per-instance state) does not account for tenant-scoped monitoring w
The current Test 2.5 validation requirement states that all items must have independent per-instance state. This requirement is valid for authoring workloads where each item represents a distinct user-created artifact. However, it does not account for a recognised class of workloads that Microsoft itself documents: operational monitoring tools.
For monitoring workloads whose data source is the tenant itself, two items in the same tenant will always surface identical data by architectural necessity. This is the same pattern used by Microsoft's own Fabric Capacity Metrics app and Workspace Monitoring Eventhouse, both of which surface shared tenant-wide data regardless of how many instances or consumers access them.
Applying Test 2.5 uniformly to monitoring workloads produces a requirement that is architecturally impossible to satisfy without misrepresenting the underlying data or fundamentally breaking the product's value proposition.
Request:
Review Test 2.5 applicability for workloads declared under the trackData itemJobTypes category or any workload whose architecture is tenant-scoped by design.
Introduce a formal distinction in the validation framework between authoring workloads and monitoring/operational workloads.
Where a workload demonstrates that shared state is architecturally intentional and documented in the attestation, allow the Not-Supported with attestation path as a valid resolution for Test 2.5 rather than a hard fail.
Impact: This currently blocks certification for a valid and well-architected class of Fabric workloads that Microsoft explicitly encourages partners to build.
Recent ideas
Allow Managed Private Endpoint to be disabled/enabled per notebook
Could notebooks have an option to use or not use the workspace's Managed Private Endpoint (MPE)? MPE can significantly increase notebook startup time, even for notebooks that don't need private conn...frithjof_v1 day agoCommunity ChampionNew25Views1like0CommentsJustification Prompts When Downgrading or Removing Sensitivity Labels in Power BI Desktop
Description Currently, organizations can configure Microsoft Purview sensitivity label policies to require users to provide a justification when removing a label or lowering its classification. T...vvargasv2 days agoMicrosoft EmployeeNew12Views0likes0CommentsMatrix: column totals as a bar chart docked to the edge
What's missing Data bars already work on the Total row and column through conditional formatting, so row totals can be read as length. Column totals cannot: they render as a horizontal bar inside a ...Sayurivalente2 days agoRegular VisitorNew80Views6likes1Comment