Validation requirement Test 2.5 (per-instance state) does not account for tenant-scoped monitoring w
The current Test 2.5 validation requirement states that all items must have independent per-instance state. This requirement is valid for authoring workloads where each item represents a distinct user-created artifact. However, it does not account for a recognised class of workloads that Microsoft itself documents: operational monitoring tools.
For monitoring workloads whose data source is the tenant itself, two items in the same tenant will always surface identical data by architectural necessity. This is the same pattern used by Microsoft's own Fabric Capacity Metrics app and Workspace Monitoring Eventhouse, both of which surface shared tenant-wide data regardless of how many instances or consumers access them.
Applying Test 2.5 uniformly to monitoring workloads produces a requirement that is architecturally impossible to satisfy without misrepresenting the underlying data or fundamentally breaking the product's value proposition.
Request:
Review Test 2.5 applicability for workloads declared under the trackData itemJobTypes category or any workload whose architecture is tenant-scoped by design.
Introduce a formal distinction in the validation framework between authoring workloads and monitoring/operational workloads.
Where a workload demonstrates that shared state is architecturally intentional and documented in the attestation, allow the Not-Supported with attestation path as a valid resolution for Test 2.5 rather than a hard fail.
Impact: This currently blocks certification for a valid and well-architected class of Fabric workloads that Microsoft explicitly encourages partners to build.
Recent ideas
Power Query Parameter create/use when connecting to a dataflow
In power query when you connect to a table in a dataflow there are no options to create or use a parameter for that dataflow. When connecting to SQL there is an option when setting up the connection ...ben_holmes22 minutes agoNew MemberNeed Clarification202Views3likes2CommentsMake Copilot Approval status for semantic model available through API
In recent versions fabric allowed to mark a semantic model as approved for copilot to reduce AI adoption friction. However there is no specific way for external governance application to analyse whi...FrançoisD36 minutes agoFrequent VisitorNew1View0likes0CommentsClone a workspace, including its data, to a new workspace
Description: Today there's no way to fully clone a Fabric workspace: git sync and Deployment Pipelines move item definitions only, not the underlying data; Warehouse's zero-copy CREATE TABLE ... AS ...gclements1 hour agoHelper IINew6Views1like0CommentsAllow NotebookUtils getSecret() to authenticate with Workspace Identity
Current behavior In Microsoft Fabric, notebookutils.credentials.getSecret() authenticates against Azure Key Vault using the identity of the user who executes the notebook. This behavior appli...tmihara7 hours agoNew MemberNew7Views0likes0CommentsSupport Synonyms in Fabric Warehouse
Microsoft SQL Server has a very powerful feature by the way of "synonyms." It allows users and DBAs to do all sorts of powerful magic such as rewiring objects under the hood (e.g. run the code agains...matthias-bi10 hours agoRegular VisitorNew1.3KViews18likes2Comments