Map dot/bubble sizes should scale properly (with zero= a tiny dot)

[mpcarpenter]

The minimum dot/bubble size in maps is too big and as a result visualisations are misleading as dots representing very different values can appear the same size (as discussed in the forum under "desktop-Map point sizes almost all the same" where some examples are posted). The obvious answer is for zero values to be represented by single points (with maybe an option for zeros not to be plotted at all)? (I’ve posted this here so people can vote for this to get sorted)

[pierrick_horpi1]

This still doesnt't ! When you Microsoft guys are you going to really implement thid feature ????

[paige2]

Why is this marked as completed when it's not resolved? The issue isn't about adjusting the bubble size overall, it's about how the size of the bubbles scale based off the data. All the bubbles look nearly the same size, despite a large variance in the data.. It makes the visualization useless.

[STH14459]

The bubbles size is still bugged, I have the same size for valus going from simple to 4 times bigger...

[JurgenS]

Agree with other users. This issue is not resolved. Bubble sizes are not proportional to data values.

[Daniel_Kitslaar]

I agree this issue needs to be addressed... There should be a simple slider in the visual settings allowing you to change the variance of the bubble size