At least as an option, allow fields to be ordered the same as the source query rather than alphabetical. This way they can be put in a logical and consistent order. Obviously, a workaround is to prefix each column name with a number but this is clunky, unattractive and a pain if the columns change often.
78 Comments
- ChristianDiscerAdvocate IThe task pane displays database fields in alphabetical order. Please allow the field list to be displayed in original, or database defined order.
- pbiideas1New MemberFound a related idea: "Display field names in database, not alpha, order"
- aleksandarkostaNew Membercan you order variables in fields section as imported from Excel
- steve_gorhamNew MemberCurrently if you set the "Default Field Set" field order in an SSAS Tabular model, it is not utilized by Power BI in the Fields pane. It still only sorts alphabetically.
- fbcideas_migusrNew MemberWhen looking at the tables in the Relationships window - and to make new relationships - it would really help to show the fields in alphabetical order. It feels like I'm always going on a scavenger hunt when I'm trying to find a field because I have to scroll thru the entire list looking for it. This can be challenging and time consuming, especially with large tables. Thanks!
- vincentvanasperNew MemberWould really like this to be supported.
- jonathan_marti6New MemberGreat Idea, and possibly to group fields together as well?
- martint1New MemberSSAS Tabular has a "Table Detail Position" described as "...field ordering that define the default field set when visualizing this table in certain client tools". Surprisingly, Power BI is not such a "client tool". Frankly, quite odd, when you think of how closely related Power BI and SSAS tabular are underneath.
- martint1New MemberCross post https://ideas.powerbi.com/forums/265200-power-bi-ideas/suggestions/18355429-use-field-order-as-ordered-in-source-query
- mark-allen-perrNew MemberI agree that the 'default' order for "Fields" should be whatever it is in the source. There is a reason the source has the fields in a specific order, so changing it means the 'structure view' to the user has changed. Please keep the order the same by default, and then (maybe) allow changes to be modified to 'sorted A-Z', etc. Many thanks.
Recent ideas
Dynamic ADLS-Gen2 path input for Spark Jobs Main definition file
I would like the ability to add a dynamic input box on a spark job definition's "Main Definition File" "ADLS-Gen2 path". this would be useful to set base and variable paths across all spark jobs...mfink_db1 hour agoNew MemberNew233Views2likes2CommentsReintroduce Tenant/Capacity Switch to Control "Users can create Plan items" Post-GA
During the Preview phase of Fabric Plan items, administrators had access to a dedicated tenant/capacity setting: "Users can create Plan items". With General Availability (GA), this granular administr...Sri-Surendra_Ku4 hours agoNew MemberNew105Views14likes1CommentSupport Fabric SQL Database with workspace-level inbound Private Link
Fabric SQL Database supports tenant-level Private Link but not workspace-level Private Link. Securing a small number of databases therefore requires enabling Private Link across the entire tenant, in...WorkFull226 hours agoAdvocate INew12Views1like0CommentsImprove Relationship UI Wording to Better Reflect Filter Propagation Direction
The current relationship dialog can be confusing because the UI labels "From" and "To" do not always align with users' linguistic expectations regarding filter propagation. As per document : Relation...v-varunvv6 hours agoMicrosoft EmployeeNew20Views4likes0Comments