Forum Discussion

_bs_'s avatar
_bs_
Advocate I
6 months ago
Solved

thoughts on design principles

I'm currently develeoping a report using PBI desktop on my own machine and publishing it to the Service. My report has connections to 3 existing semantic models in order to create a Company wide rep...
  • Ritaf1983's avatar
    6 months ago

    Hi _bs_ 

    The current architecture using Composite Models (DirectQuery over Power BI Datasets) is the correct approach and aligns with the industry standard for "Golden Datasets." The appearance of "Analysis Services" connections is technically accurate because every Power BI Dataset is hosted on an internal Azure Analysis Services instance; this is not "messy" but rather how the backend exposes the connection string.

    Regarding the concern about a user leaving the organization, this is an administrative task rather than an architectural flaw. If the original owner's account is disabled, another workspace admin can simply use the "Take Over" feature in the dataset settings to transfer ownership and update credentials. Ideally, for production environments, the connection should be authenticated via a Service Principal to decouple the report's lifecycle from individual employees entirely.

    Switching to the proposed alternative of importing data directly from the Data Warehouse would be a strategic error. It creates "Data Silos," forces the redundant recreation of measures across multiple files (violating the DRY principle), and increases maintenance overhead significantly. If a business definition changes, you would have to update every individual file rather than just the upstream semantic model. Sticking to the shared semantic model ensures a "Single Version of the Truth" and efficient capacity usage.

    If this post helps, then please consider Accepting it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly